A LEFT-WING SNP candidate has said she took her children out of the state education system to go private due to a lack of wrap-around care.
At an impassioned hustings in Edinburgh last week, Ashten Regan-Denham said her twins went to a state school for six years before her family decided on a fee-paying institution.
A staunch social justice advocate, Regan-Denham was the lobbyist for the socialist Common Weal think tank, an organisation whose motto is ‘All Of Us First’.
She is also the SNP’s Holyrood candidate in Edinburgh Eastern, where she is up against Labour leader Kezia Dugdale.
In the past, she has described the Common Weal as rejecting the “survival of the richest, winner takes all mentality”, while one of the body’s policy papers stated: “One step to reducing this inequality would be to remove unnecessary religious segregation from our school system, and remove the charitable status of private schools, with the ultimate goal of rendering them redundant.”
However, Regan-Denham was criticised last year after it emerged that, despite the Common Weal’s left-wing stance, her own children are educated privately.
At a hustings in Portobello on Wednesday, an SNP supporter was critical of her schooling decision and asked all the candidates whether politicians should be held to account for their personal lives and choices.
Regan-Denham said of her children: “They were in state schools – I’ve got twins – so they were in state schools for six years, so they were there for quite a long time.”
“When I started working in Edinburgh, as a working mother, without the wrap-around care that I needed, because I was living at that time in the Borders … I just couldn’t make it work.”
“As a family, we decided to look at other alternatives.”
She continued: “I went to a state school. My husband went to a state school. And my kids did go there prior to that.”
Peter McColl, the Scottish Green candidate on the panel, said: “I wouldn’t ever send children, if I had children, to a private school.”
Nick Cook, the Conservative representative, said: “I think it’s important people aren’t seen to be hypocritical in terms of saying one thing in public … but do something quite different in private.”
Dugdale did not address her SNP opponent’s personal choices, but reiterated her party’s opposition to private schools enjoying charitable status.
However, the subject was raised again by voters at the hustings, with one individual defending Regan-Denham by sarcastically asking if living in a house affected a person’s ability to care about poverty.
The SNP candidate replied: “That lady absolutely hit the nail on the head, when she said that if you own a house, or live in a house and you’ve got a mortgage, that somehow precludes you from campaigning against poverty. Of course it doesn’t.”
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: "Even Ash Denham has now accepted that the SNP's record on childcare is appalling. Despite the SNP's claims, thousands of parents can't access the free childcare they are entitled to. The SNP claim to be investing in childcare yet they are cutting the budget for the local councils delivering it. The cuts to schools and local services also mean the after-school clubs and extra curricular clubs that so many parents rely on are being cut.
"Not everybody has as much money as Ash Denham to be able to be able to get round the fact that childcare in Scotland isn't flexible enough. Labour will stop the cuts and invest in nurseries and schools that so many parents and children rely on."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel