SCOTS Tory leader Ruth Davidson has revealed plans to charge university students backdoor tuition fees of more than £6000 for a four-year degree course.
She confirmed plans to charge an endowment of "just over" £1500 for each year of study after students graduate.
She also revealed prescription charges would be reintroduced and rise to £8 within a few years, if her party wins the Holyrood election on May 5.
Details emerged during STV's live leaders' debate, held at Edinburgh's Assembly Rooms.
During a section of the two-hour debate in which the leaders cross-examined each other, Ms Davidson was challenged directly by SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon to spell out her plans.
The grilling followed heated exchanges between the leaders' of Holyrood's five parties on their tax plans, when Ms Davidson criticised her opponents for refusing to pass on George Osborne's generous tax cuts for higher earners.
University tuition fees were scrapped in Scotland by the last Labour-LibDem administration, which replaced them with a smaller graduate endowment.
Dubbed 'backdoor tuition fees,' the endowment was abolished when the SNP came to power in 2007.
Defending its return, Ms Davidson said scrapping charges had starved education of investment and led to the axing of more than 140,000 college places.
She said ending prescription charges had cost the NHS £60million a year, which she promised to re-invest in frontline services.
But, commenting after the debate, SNP business convener Derek Mackay said: "Rather than being a party of low taxes, we now know the Tories are simply the party of hidden taxes.
“It’s clear that Ruth Davidson is now on the run as the extent of her plans for hidden taxes have come to light."
The debate, the second of three televised showdowns in the run-up to the poll on May 5, included questions from the audience in addition to the cross-examinations.
Ms Davidson used her questions to attack Ms Sturgeon over her planned independence campaign later this summer, winning applause when she asked: "How is campaigning for independence respecting the result of the referendum?"
She also took a swipe at Kezia Dugdale, the Scottish Labour leader, who earlier this year said she allow her party's MSPs to campaign in favour of independence.
Ms Dugdale said she was "steadfastly opposed" to a second referendum.
Later in the debate, responding to a question from the audience about a possible second referendum, Ms Sturgeon said: "I think the next time we'll vote Yes.
"But I know we've got to get the arguments better than we did last time."
She said a future SNP government would call a second referendum if there was clear majority support for one.
Earlier in the debate, host Bernard Ponsonby had to step in repeatedly as the leaders clashed over their parties' tax plans.
Ms Sturgeon said the SNP's proposals for modest income tax cuts combined with higher council tax bills for people living in bigger homes would raise £2billion.
But the plans were dismissed by Ms Dugdale and Mr Rennie, who have pledged to hike income tax.
Mr Rennie said: "The timidity of Nicola Sturgeon, I think, is letting Scotland down."
Setting out Labour's plan to raise basic and higher rate income tax by 1p and the additional rate by 5p, she said: "We can generate enough money to cancel the cuts."
She said a future Scottish Government would need to raise double the £2billion outlined by Ms Sturgeon to reverse cuts imposed by the Conservative Government at Westminster.
Turning to the SNP leader, she said: "She cannot feasibly say she is against austerity."
Ms Dugdale's comments were later seized on by the SNP, which said Labour's tax plans would fail to raise £4billion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel