The Queen has been urged to step in and stop the killing of hundreds of mountain hares on her Balmoral estate in the wake of new evidence of mass culls in Scotland.
Delnadamph, which is part of the Queen's Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire, has been accused of working with other estates to shoot large numbers of hares. Two culls involving three estates were witnessed towards the end of February, one of which was said to have killed 500 hares.
The allegations have been made by the veteran scientist, Dr Adam Watson, who says he has reliable accounts from eyewitnesses and other informed sources. The two alleged culls are in addition to the mass killing suggested by a photograph of a pickup truck full of dead hares on the Lecht published by the Sunday Herald last weekend.
“In each case, a brutal military-type operation occurred, with scores of quad bikes and snow scooters driving the hares up to armed staff hidden higher up, and frequent bangs from guns,” Watson said.
“These severe killings show no respect for the public or for wildlife under stress during snowy weather.”
Landowners insist that shooting hares is perfectly legal, and doesn’t jeopardise their populations. But Watson argues that mass killings are in breach of European law because they are indiscriminate and damage the animals’ conservation status.
Hares are culled in the belief that this stops them spreading disease to grouse, thereby ensuring that there are more birds available to be shot for sport. But this is also disputed by Watson and conservation groups.
David Windle, chairman of the North East Mountain Trust, which brings together hillwalking and mountaineering groups, was “astonished that employees of the Delnadamph estate were allowed to take part in this cruel and immoral activity.”
He said: “We trust that when the matter is brought to the Queen’s attention, she issues clear instructions banning her Delnadamph staff and equipment from taking part in such severe killings.”
The government’s wildlife agency, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), has urged “restraint” managing mountain hares. But despite this “heavy culls of hares have continued on some estates,” SNH mammal specialist, Rob Raynor, told the Sunday Herald.
It was “questionable” whether they were showing restrain, he said. “Until we have more accurate information on hare densities and population trends in these areas, doubts remain over the long-term sustainability of such culling.”
Much of the culling has taken place within the Cairngorms National Park, which has also expressed concern. The park authority’s conservation director, Hamish Trench, said that the balance between management for grouse and other wildlife needed to be “reset”.
Bill Lobban, vice-convener of Highland Council and the councillor for Badenoch and Strathspey, described the evidence used to justify culls as “dubious in the extreme”.
He said: “People who visit our national parks do so for many different reasons but I would suggest that few, if any, do so to witness slaughter on the scale that has been evidenced recently.”
Dr Gus Jones, convener of the Badenoch and Strathspey Conservation Group argued that voluntary restraint wasn’t working. “We are frustrated at the lack of progress being made in improving management of our mountain hare populations,” he said.
Scottish Land and Estates, which represents landowners, dismissed Watson’s allegations as “misleading and inaccurate”.
Tim Baynes, director of the organisation’s Scottish Moorland Group said: “Culling has indeed taken place in the Cairngorms but has been done at all times legally, in accordance with best practice and as per the agreed protocol.”
Balmoral’s factor, Richard Gledson, and Buckingham Palace did not respond to requests to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel