GUN controls introduced in the wake of the Dunblane tragedy have made the system safe enough for a relaxation of firearms law, it has been claimed.
Exactly two decades since 16 school children and their teacher were gunned down by scout master Thomas Hamilton, field sports lobbyists want more exemptions of the kinds seen for for the 2014 Commonwealth Games and the 2012 Olympics.
They believe checks and balances - including new ones introduced next month - have revolutionised firearms controls to such an extent that exemptions would be safe.
From April, GPs will record firearm licence applications on their patients’ notes and be required to notify the police of any factors which might be of concern.
A permanent marker will be held on the records of firearms certificate holders.
A 'Gun Safety Line', operated by Crimestoppers, also opens this year and allows anyone to register concerns about a gun owner, whether legal or not.
However, Gill Marshall-Andrews, of the Gun Control Network, warned against further exemptions.
She said: "The UK now has some of the tightest gun controls and lowest rates of gun violence in the world but the pressure from shooters to roll back gun control legislation is as strong as ever."
Following the Dunblane massacre, the government banned private possession of handguns almost completely.
There were some limited exceptions to the ban in 2012 and 2014 but even the UK's Olympic shooters fall under the controls and can only train in Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man, or Switzerland, in practice.
Around 162,000 pistols and 700 tons of ammunition and related equipment were handed in by an estimated 57,000 people.
A spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeepers Association said there was room for some relaxation of the rules.
He said: “There was quite rightly a huge public outcry at the time of the awful Dunblane tragedy and it is understandable the families and the public demanded action in the aftermath.
“Banning guns will never, solely, be the answer to ending gun crime. The acid test will always be whether it has prevented criminals from acquiring and using guns.
“In the fields of shooting or gamekeeping, criminal acts involving firearms remain few and far between and have done for many years.
"They are not held for any constitutional right to defence, like in the US, but for legitimate activity and work.
“In order to enable sporting shooters to train in their own country and to ensure the sport continues for future generations, there should be an ability to alter the legislation, carefully, to bring in a tight exemption for that specific purpose.”
Christopher Graffius, spokesman for the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, Britain's largest country shooting organisation with over 120,000 members, agreed.
He said: "We have the opportunity now because firearms licensing practices and systems have changed incredibly, they have been revolutionised, since that awful tragedy two decades ago.
"We're now talking about computerised police forces and real-time reporting and indeed changes coming through the political system means 24/7 365 available medical reports.
"In Scotland shooting influences 4.5 million hectares of land, has a conservation labour force of 3900 full-time equivalent jobs and produces an actual full-time equivalent workforce of 8800 and is worth £200 million."
Mick North, whose daughter Sophie was one of those killed at Dunblane, stressed the legacy of the ban.
Speaking to the Radio Times, he said: "Are we and our children now safer from guns? The answer is a definite 'yes'.
"Gun crime is significantly lower, gun murders are extremely rare and criminals are finding it harder than ever to get guns."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel