A MAN who had his conviction for murdering his partner quashed has failed in a bid for compensation after a judge ruled there was “compelling evidence” he had committed the crime.
Craig McCreight, 44, was jailed for life in 2002 following a trial in which he was found guilty of killing Yvonne Davidson by poisoning her with chloroform at their home in Broxburn, West Lothian, three years earlier.
But judges ruled in 2009 he had been a victim of a miscarriage of justice after hearing scientific evidence in the case was flawed.
They quashed his conviction and a bid to bring a fresh prosecution against Mr McCreight was refused.
However, that was before the introduction of double jeopardy legislation that allows an accused to be tried twice for the same crime.
Mr McCreight launched a bid for damages against the Scottish Government for the seven years he spent in prison but the application was refused.
Following a judicial review at the Court of Session, his attempt to overturn that decision has also been refused.
Lord McEwan said his murder conviction did not represent “the righting of a mistaken verdict” and there was strong evidence Mr McCreight had carried out the killing.
The law lord said Mr McCreight fell into a category of compensation claimants who had been “lucky to escape what was due to them”.
In a written judgment, Lord McEwan said: “In the result I am clearly of the opinion that this petition cannot succeed. I do not find any merit in the petitioner’s case.
“There was strong and compelling evidence against him, including two confessions, and in my opinion he falls into the second category described by Lord Bingham in McFarland para 7 H.”
Mr McCreight had denied murdering Ms Davidson, 34, at his original trial at the High Court in Edinburgh, but following his conviction was ordered to serve at least 18 years in jail before the successful appeal.
Following the discovery of her body in a neighbour’s garden, Ms Davidson’s death was attributed to hypothermia and amphetamine but Mr McCreight is alleged to have later confessed to two people about his role in her death.
During the trial, the Crown contended Mr McCreight had used a rag soaked in chloroform and placed it to her mouth and nose.
The Crown Office said it maintained a database of all unsolved old crimes in case they could be prosecuted under double jeopardy legislation.
A spokesman said: “The Cold Case Unit works closely with Police Scotland to review these cases to ascertain if there are any new evidential developments, including advances in forensic techniques that would assist in providing a basis for criminal proceedings.
“There is a risk of prejudicing fresh prosecutions by commenting further on individual cases or providing details on how a particular case is being dealt with. It would therefore be inappropriate to comment further at this time.”
Mr McCreight said: “I have not had the chance to read the judgment yet so I don’t want to make any comment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article