THE family and representatives of a Scot sentenced to death in Pakistan for blasphemy has criticised UK Government efforts to free their father, claiming his race could be a factor.
The claims by relatives of Mohammad Asghar come days after a legal bid to have the threat of execution lifted collapsed when prosecutors failed to appear at court.
Mr Asghar, from Edinburgh, has been imprisoned in Pakistan accused of writing letters in which he claimed to be the Prophet Mohammed since 2010 and was sentenced to death in January 2014, despite his lawyers’ claims he was mentally unfit to stand trial.
The 71-year-old has paranoid schizophrenia and was shot in the back by a prison guard at Adiala prison in Rawalpindi in September 2014, prompting a series of calls for the Prime Minster to step in.
His daughter Jasmine Rana accused the Government of failing the family by telling them to remain silent to protect behind the scenes efforts to release Mr Asghar.
But she expressed concerns nothing had happened while her father remained on death row.
She told the Sunday Mail: "We were told to say nothing, remain silent, and let the officials talk to each other,” she said.
"We remained silent but can remain silent no longer. Words are easy but we need action and we need it now.
"Would he still be there if he was white? That is a question only David Cameron can answer but what do I think? No, he would not."
Mr Asghar's solicitor Aamer Anwar added: "There is nothing, absolutely nothing in Islam that justifies the taking of innocent life by the use of blasphemy laws.
"Yet the Pakistani authorities have repeatedly breached their legal, moral and international obligations towards Mohammad Asghar.
"Inevitably, the question that has arisen is whether things would have been different if Mohammad Asghar was a white grandfather from Edinburgh.
"After all, this isn’t Isis holding a British citizen, it’s a friendly government. We supply them with weapons, share intelligence and gave them £1billion in aid over the last two years.
"Yet, for some reason, our Prime Minister has been spineless in negotiating the return home of Mohammad Asghar, a frightened 71-year-old who is suffering from severe paranoid schizophrenia, sentenced to death for blasphemy because the courts refused to listen to the medical evidence."
Mr Asghar remains in a secure hospital, held in isolation in a windowless room. His family have urged the Prime Minister to promise to protect liberal politicians who have called for a relaxation of the blasphemy laws in Pakistan.
Some have been assassinated and many more have been intimidated into silence.
Last week, a crowd of 100,000 gathered for the funeral of religious assassin Mumtaz Qadri in Pakistan. He was executed for murdering Salmaan Taseer, the governor of Punjab, who had criticised the country’s blasphemy laws and voiced support for a Christian woman who had been convicted of the charge.
While in jail, Qadri incited a prison guard to shoot Mr Asghar as he rested in his cell.
The Foreign Office yesterday insisted Mr Asghar’s case continues to be a “high priority”.
A spokeswoman said: “We continue to raise it at senior levels in Pakistan to ensure that he is receiving the best possible support.
“Consular officials continue to monitor Mr Asghar’s situation and are in regular contact with his family.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We are extremely concerned about Mr Asghar’s wellbeing and we continue to work with all relevant parties to ensure his safety. We stand by to help in any way that we can.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel