The life of Torness nuclear power station has been extended by an extra seven years, its parent company EDF Energy have revealed
Torness power station in Dunbar will now be in operation until 2030.
The power station is one of four to have its operating life extended by EDF Energy. Heysham 2 in Lancashire has also had its operations extended until 2030, while Heysham 1 and Hartlepool, due to be decommissioned in 2019, will continue for an extra five years.
The French firm is planning to build a new nuclear power station at Hinckley Point in Somerset but is still to make a final investment decision.
EDF said the decision followed "extensive technical and safety reviews".
"Our continuing investment, our expertise and the professional relationship we have with the safety regulator means we can safely prolong the operating life of our nuclear power stations," said chief executive Vincent de Rivaz.
"Their excellent output shows that reliability is improving whilst their safety and environmental performance is higher than ever."
The four nuclear plants employ over 2,000 permanent staff and 1,000 contractors.
EDF has agreed a deal in principle for the £18 billion Hinkley project under which China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) will pay a third of the cost.
Reports have suggested the company is struggling to find the cash for its stake.
Greenpeace has said the delay means it is not certain that the final go ahead will be given. The campaign group said the project faces "unprecedented opposition" from EDF's management and French unions over costs.
The four nuclear plants which will generate power for longer, supply electricity to around a quarter of the UK's homes.
Mr de Rivaz added: "In today's extremely challenging market conditions, our belief that Government policy will be maintained and strengthened gives us the confidence to invest in our nuclear stations. This gives customers the best value low carbon electricity available.
"It's a great achievement by thousands of EDF Energy staff and partners in the supply chain who have worked so hard to show that we can deliver on performance, reliability and safety."
EDF said it was committed to being the UK's leading investor in low carbon electricity, adding in a statement: "That means safely extending the lives of existing nuclear power stations and investing in renewable wind energy.
"It also means making the big investments necessary to launch a renaissance in nuclear new build at Hinkley Point in Somerset."
The statement continued: "Further major progress was made in 2015 on plans to build a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset, notably with the signing of the Strategic Investment Agreement between EDF and China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) in October.
"Hinkley Point C is a strong project which is fully ready for a final investment decision and successful construction. Final steps are well in hand to enable the full construction phase to be launched very soon."
Last night, Greenpeace projected a huge picture of Chancellor George Osborne wearing a hard hat sporting the EDF logo on to the House of Commons and the Treasury, with the words "Let it go, George everyone else has #LetHinkleyGo".
Greenpeace policy director Doug Parr said: "EDF's accounts show growing debts and falling earnings. EDF management and employees warn taking on further risk could easily spell disaster for the company. Hinkley is a bad investment and most people with an ounce of financial acumen have now come to realise this.
"George Osborne stands alone in defending Hinkley's honour. He needs to let Hinkley go - everyone else has. The nuclear industry has usually promised far more than it has delivered and the debacle over the Hinkley reactor shows little has changed.
"Hinkley will be one of the most expensive objects on earth and George Osborne is happy to force this year's school leavers to pay over the odds for it until they are about to draw their pensions. But wind and solar power could be subsidy-free well before Hinkley could ever come on stream."
Paul Kenny, general secretary of the GMB union, said: "The UK government owned Central Electricity Generating Board that built the UK nuclear power stations EDF are extending.
"We welcome this extension to give more base load electricity capacity while Hinkley Point C is brought on stream.
"It is inconceivable that the Hinkley Point C site should become the most expensive landscaped grounds in the UK if work is stopped and the project does not go ahead.
"If the plan to finance the building of this station by the French and Chinese governments is no longer viable then the UK government has total responsibility to the people of this country to build the power stations needed to supply our electricity needs.
"The supply chain is in place and the labour force is coming on stream to construct this station essential to keep the lights on in the UK.
"The UK government can no longer outsource the building of our power stations to foreign governments.
"The UK built the first generation of nuclear power stations so we can build the new generation we need for low carbon reliable base load electricity. "
Dr Richard Dixon, director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "EDF have announced the life extension for Torness because they are trying to distract attention from their terrible financial performance and their repeated failure to make a final decision on whether to build the Hinkley Point reactors in Somerset.
"Nuclear power is on its last legs in Europe and Hinkley will probably never get built. The UK Government needs to refocus on energy efficiency and renewables instead of continuing to chase the nuclear dream."
Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: "The plans to extend the life of four of the UK's nuclear power stations is welcome news for the local, regional and national economy. As well as providing secure, low-carbon electricity to millions of UK homes and businesses, lifetime extensions will help safeguard hundreds of skilled jobs in Scotland and the North of England.
"2015 was one of the best years for output for the UK's nuclear fleet. The investment in keeping stations running helps maintain the UK's security of supply, and avoids the generation of millions of additional tonnes of CO2."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel