A review of Scotland's public sector has recommended sweeping changes to the way taxpayers' money is spent.
It coincided with a promise by John Swinney, the new SNP Finance Secretary, to deliver a slimmer government and more spending power at local level.
The independent inquiry, carried out by experienced government officials, has suggested some highly controversial changes, with £818m in savings and a further £430m potential in further efficiencies. They are thought to represent around 4% of Scottish Executive spending.
The Howat Report was controversially suppressed by Labour and LibDem ministers in the months before the election but was published yesterday by the new SNP administration.
For universities, it suggests a move to a three-year basic degree, from Scotland's traditional four-year model.
The review argues for one centre providing shared services for Scotland's 13 university campuses, as well as one for further education colleges.
It recommends the abolition of Learning and Teaching Scotland, official adviser to the executive on the school curriculum, while saying school closures should be a high priority. It says £57m in bus company subsidies could be withdrawn, with the reckoning that would lead to a 17% increase to fares. Road maintenance could be cut by more than half, saving £67m annually.
Health boards could save £50m on the NHS drugs bill each year, while senior consultants should lose the £20m of bonus pay which was found to be distributed by "buggin's turn" and without scrutiny.
The review found the Cities Growth Fund, set up four years ago and worth £42m each year, should be wound up, as it is not having the intended impact. Legal aid could be cut by 10% or £17m, and police, fire and ambulance training should be in one centre. Many budgets were found to be capable of 7% efficiency savings. The review team also recommends Scottish Water should be taken out of direct ministerial control and turned into a mutual company, saving the executive £182m in capital allocations each year.
That was the only one out of scores of recommendations that was firmly rejected by Mr Swinney yesterday, as the Finance and Sustainable Growth Secretary set out his guidelines for spending more than £30bn of public money over each of the next four years. He announced the budget process is likely to run at least a month behind schedule be-cause it will not be clear until mid-October how much the Treasury will release in Scotland's block grant over the next three years.
The normal budget process would require the Finance Minister to bring the budget before the Finance Committee by mid-September.
Mr Swinney said all of Howat, except for the Scottish Water recommendation, would be considered as part of the budget review.
There was pressure from Labour during a Holyrood debate to open up the budget process to more scrutiny and opposition amendments, reflecting the SNP's lack of a parliamentary majority.
Mr Swinney said: "The report highlights that Scotland has a crowded public sector landscape.
"This is causing duplication and a lack of focus. In recent years, an organisational spaghetti of partnership and networks has grown, alongside a hugely complex system of performance monitoring and funding."
He promised a simpler, smaller government would help "declutter this landscape".
He also promised there would be no compulsory redundancies resulting from executive policies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article