The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has been accused of making money from weapons of mass destruction after it was named as the biggest financial backer of nuclear bombs in the UK.
New international analysis by disarmament groups reveals that over the last four years RBS has lent £4.5 billion to 21 major companies involved in nuclear weapons in the UK, the US, France and India. They include firms that work on the Trident weapons systems, such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, Jacobs Engineering and Serco.
One of the bank’s most controversial loans has been £27 million to Larsen & Toubro, which develops the launcher system for India’s Akash nuclear missiles. India is widely regarded as a nuclear outlaw because it has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
‘Don’t Bank on the Bomb’, a report complied by the Dutch peace organisation Pax and the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), lists RBS in a “hall of shame” for its nuclear loans. Other UK banks on the list include Barclays with £3.8bn in loans, HSBC with £2.9bn, Old Mutual with £2.8bn and Lloyds with £1.3bn.
Internationally the report names 382 banks, insurance companies and pension funds from 27 countries that have made £323 billion available to nuclear weapons producers since January 2012. It also highlights the fast-growing number of financial institutions – 53 - that now prohibit or limit their nuclear investments.
One of the report’s author’s, Wilbert van der Zeijden from Pax, was in Scotland last week briefing politicians and campaigners on his findings. Most Scottish people, most Scottish political parties and the Church of Scotland have all rejected Trident, he pointed out.
“It's time the biggest Scottish bank, RBS, stopped financing the companies making Trident,” he said. “While Scotland is trying to get rid of weapons of mass destruction, RBS is trying to make money on them.”
RBS did have a policy of restricting its loans to weapons companies, but this had not prevented it from financing 21 nuclear weapons companies, Zeijden added. “A treaty banning nuclear weapons is coming. Continuing to invest in their producers is a bad investment strategy.”
Rebecca Sharkey, co-ordinator ICAN UK, said: “Anyone with a Royal Bank of Scotland bank account or pension may be unwittingly and unwillingly complicit in funding companies that produce weapons of mass destruction.”
The new report would increase the financial stigma on nuclear weapons, she argued. “It will help people and institutions to divest ahead of a new global ban treaty that will likely make the financing of nuclear weapons illegal as part of a wider prohibition.”
John Ainslie, co-ordinator of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, pointed out that in the Netherlands banks had been forced to rethink their investments in nuclear weapons after customers threatened to take their business elsewhere.
“Just when you thought the reputation of RBS couldn't fall any lower, we find out that they are taking our money and investing it in nuclear weapons,” he said. “RBS don't just support Trident they also fuel proliferation by funding India's nuclear missile programme.”
RBS was bailed out by the UK government after the financial crisis in 2008 and is now 73 per cent publicly owned. In recent years the bank has been refocusing its business to become simpler and more concentrated on the UK.
An RBS spokesman did not dispute the loans to nuclear bomb companies. “All of our lending to defence companies is subject to enhanced due diligence,” he said.
“RBS operates a clear prohibition on the funding of highly controversial weapons including cluster munitions, anti-personnel landmines, biological and toxin weapons, chemical weapons and blinding laser weapons.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel