The Government has been accused of launching an "ideological attack" on workers' rights as it seeks to navigate its controversial Trade Union Bill over its final Commons hurdle.
The Bill would make it harder for industrial action to go ahead by introducing a 50% turnout requirement for strike ballots.
Meanwhile, in certain public services at least 40% of the people entitled to vote would have to vote yes for action to go ahead.
The Bill has now returned to the House of Commons for report stage and third reading after it cleared its second reading in September.
Chris Stephens, the SNP's trade union spokesman, blasted the Bill as he introduced a number of amendments his party would like to make.
"This is an ideological attack against the largest group in civic society who stands up against exploitation," he said.
Proposed SNP and Plaid Cymru amendments would ensure that the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly, Northern Ireland Assembly, Mayor of London and other public bodies and local authorities would have final sign off on whether the Bill should actually be applied.
Mr Stephens said: "I think it is important that public bodies across the United Kingdom have their say and consent on whether this Bill and provisions of this Bill should be passed.
"I also believe that if any public body gives their consent, that consent could be taken away on a future occasion."
Joan Ryan, Labour MP for Enfield North, was equally critical of the Bill
"Trade unionists are real people and it's not just trade unions and trade unionists who object to this Bill," she said.
"The Government has significantly failed to secure any substantial employer support for these proposals."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article