John Bercow has pledged to keep a "beady eye" on the length of speeches in the House of Commons after the Government was attacked for scuppering a Bill by filibustering last week.
Health Minister Alistair Burt talked out the Off-Patent Drugs Bill on Friday, a Bill which would have allowed for the signing-off of drugs that are out of patent and therefore no longer profitable, despite cross-party support.
Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport West, attacked the move and raised a point of order in the Commons on the subject.
"On Friday there were two debates on two Bills," he said.
"The first one occupied three-and-a-half hours and, of course, while every syllable in those speeches was in order - otherwise it would not have been allowed - some of the comments were peripheral to the subject involved and all the speeches would have been improved by abbreviation.
"But this was an entirely non-controversial, unopposed Bill.
"But sadly the second Bill had allocated only just over an hour to it and this was a Bill... which offered advantages to patients and the health service.
"This was approved by members of the house... the only objection came from the Government benches who spoke on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry.
"Sadly three attempts to have a division on the Bill, have a closure motion, were turned down and one observer has suggested... this was turned down possibly because of time.
"What we have here is the power of backbenchers against the fact that big pharma and big sugar have a throathold on this Government."
To which the Speaker, Mr Bercow, replied that "nobody has a throathold on the Chair".
"I would never be remotely apprehensive about a big pharmaceutical company or other big institutions or big people or people who think they are big," he said.
"They are not bigger than the authority that resides in the Chair."
Mr Bercow said the Chair will "keep a beady eye on the length and relevance of speeches on these occasions".
The Government's decision to talk out the Off-Patent Drugs Bill came one week after Tory MPs successfully filibustered against a Bill which proposed making carers exempt from having to pay for hospital car parking.
Conservative MP Philip Davies (Shipley) spoke during the hospital parking debate for 90 minutes, prompting a fierce backlash.
An online petition calling for the rules on filibustering to be reformed has now been started on Parliament's website and it currently has just shy of 7,000 signatures.
The petition says filibustering is "archaic, repugnant and has no place in a modern parliament".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel