The Scottish Government has proposed creating a new administrative region called Southern Scotland which could affect how hundreds of millions of pounds of European Union money is distributed.
European statisticians currently divide Scotland into four large regions - Eastern, North Eastern and South Western Scotland plus Highlands and Islands - to inform regional policy development and determine regional funding.
EU funds - which amount to around £670 million in the latest seven-year spending round - are distributed based on productivity per head in each region.
The Scottish Government has now proposed creating a fifth region which would cut the size of South Western Scotland by over a third - stripping out around 833,000 people and combining them with 113,000 from Eastern Scotland.
The new Southern Scotland region could comprise around a million people from the Scottish Borders, Dumfries and Galloway, South Lanarkshire, East Ayrshire, South Ayrshire and North Ayrshire council areas.
The Scottish Government is inviting comments on the proposed changes, and advised that they could create "statistical issues".
A consultation document states: "Boundary changes cause a discontinuity in the series and make it difficult to determine if a change in the statistics is due to a change in the geography or a change in the character of the area.
"The statistics supplied to the EU at Nuts (Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics) regions are used to formulate regional policy initiatives and to determine regional funding allocations and eligibility.
"Any changes to the boundaries of Nuts regions will impact on the statistics used in these policies and which areas are affected by these policies.
"941 million euro (£670 million) of Structural and Investment Funds were allocated over seven years from 2014 to 2020 to Nuts regions in Scotland.
"Changing the boundaries of these regions may, in the long term, affect the levels of support different areas are eligible for, as Structural Funds are distributed based on GDP per capita in each region and changing the boundaries could change the figures."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel