ALEX Salmond's £10million wave power prize should be scrapped, critics have claimed, amid fresh evidence of it sinking into chaos.
The Saltire Prize, an ambitious international contest designed to make Scotland a world leader in wave and tidal power development, was launched with great fanfare in 2008.
Earlier this year it was revealed none of the competitors could meet the qualifying criteria by the 2017 deadline.
Despite that, the Scottish Government remained committed to awarding the prize, though it has now emerged that new rules to make it winnable will not not be drawn up until next year, just months before the close of the contest.
Of the four remaining competitors, one, Aquamarine Power, called in administrators last month.
A fifth, Pelamis, pulled out after going into administration a year ago.
Murdo Fraser, the Scottish Conservative MSP, said the prize had become a "white elephant" and called for the money to put to better use.
However it has been defended by Scottish Renewables, the industry body tasked with redesigning the contest, which said it would drive innovation in the offshore renewables industry.
When he launched the prize seven years ago, then-First Minister Mr Salmond described Scotland as "the Saudi Arabia of tidal power" and claimed it had the potential to match the wealth created by North Sea oil.
Originally, the prize was to be awarded to the company which generated the most electricity above a minimum thresh-hold of 100 gigawatt hours.
The power had to be generated over a continuous two year period within the challenge period running from June 2012 to June 2017.
But in a sign of how far the competitors are from achieving the target, the firm seen as the frontrunner has yet to generate any power at all.
Edinburgh-based MayGen, which is installing underwater turbines in the Pentland Firth, is still constructing onshore facilities and will only begin generating power next year.
Lindsay Roberts, Scottish Renewables's offshore renewables policy chief, said: "A prize will help generate innovative change in the industry.
"There is a will and determination in the industry to compete for a prize but we realise we need to restructure it.
"We've been consulting with our members at the request of the Scottish Government
"We all still think a prize would be a really good idea and the Scottish Government is quite happy to continue to support it.
"We need to rethink the parameters to make it more achievable. That's far from the prize being dead."
She added: "We have not been led to believe there should be any changes to the prize money.
"All options for redesign are on the table.
"I don't think we would be happy to see the value of the prize reduced but all these decisions are up to the Scottish Government."
It is understood one option being considered is to award a number of smaller cash prizes recognising difference achievements, rather than a single £10million payout.
Mr Fraser, the Scottish Conservative economy spokesman, said: "It appears that yet another of Alex Salmond's big ideas is being exposed as little more than a PR stunt.
"Rather than wasting £10million on a jackpot nobody is going to win, the Scottish Government would have been far better off focussing on an energy policy which boosted research and development in renewables and helped firms develop projects into a commercial concern.
"That, however, would not have generated the headlines Mr Salmond wanted.
"It's time the SNP government binned this white elephant and put this money to better use."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are absolutely committed to the developing marine energy sector which has the potential to offer significant economic and environmental benefits.
"The Saltire Prize Challenge Committee is considering options for reshaping the prize to better reflect the circumstances of the wave and tidal sectors.
"Scottish Renewables has convened industry representatives and other marine energy experts to discuss revised prize options which will be considered by the Committee in the new year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel