Many British holidaymakers stranded in Sharm el-Sheikh over the Egypt security alert are resigned to a lengthy wait.
Emma Beeney, who has been in the sun-soaked resort with her young children for 10 days, said they were due to fly back to Birmingham Airport on Saturday but it was now looking extremely unlikely.
She also described witnessing "officials" at the airport offering newly-arrived tourists the chance to skip the passport control queue for £20 a head.
The Government suspended air links to the Red Sea resort on Wednesday after a Russian plane crashed last weekend, killing 224 people.
Ms Beeney, 45, from Ely in Cambridgeshire, said: "There's a few places on a couple of flights going out today but they're giving priority to people with disabilities and young children. I have registered but I don't think we'll be going."
She added: "I'm not even going to the airport. I'm not going to take my kids into that chaos. There's no point queuing up and checking in."
Monarch airlines, with whom Ms Beeney and her family were due to fly, has said its current plans are for two flights to leave for Manchester with none others currently scheduled to leave the resort on Saturday.
Other carriers are also continuing some flights, but Ms Beeney said tourists are being told the situation is changing hour by hour.
"We've been told that a flight which was due to leave today from another airline has been refused permission to land (at Sharm el-Sheikh)," she said.
Ms Beeney said despite the confusion the mood among guests at her hotel, the St George, was "relaxed" and that information from the airlines had now started getting through to guests and passengers, via text message and notice boards.
"I think it's going to be Monday or Tuesday before we get out," added Ms Beeney.
The marketing manager said airline Monarch had been asking passengers to move to another hotel but was now advising people to stay where they are, and claim back "reasonable expenses" on their return.
Ms Beeney, on holiday with her nine-year-old daughter Ruby and son Joseph, 10, said the family were taking things in their stride.
"My 10-year-old understands and he's a bit worried, but Ruby is OK.
"We were stuck in Singapore for eight days due to an ash cloud so this hasn't really been bothering either of them too much."
She also backed the Government's decision to temporarily suspend British flights saying it was "right to act" if there was intelligence of an increased security risk.
"I think if there's intelligence that something could happen then they're quite right to act and I'd rather be stopping a few days on than being put at risk," she said.
On arrival at Sharm el-Sheikh's airport, she said men she assumed to be Egyptian "officials" were approaching queues of arriving tourists at passport control offering them the chance to skip the queue for £20 each.
"It didn't look like something dodgy, at all," she added. "They were coming along the queue and then moving on to the next person along. I didn't see if anyone took them up on it."
She went on: "It could be something official, but it could be some possibly corrupt employee - who knows, if you're getting an average wage of £1 a day."
Ms Beeney also criticised the "over-dramatising" response of some tourists to the crisis.
"I've been watching the news and I can't understand some of the over-dramatising that I've seen from some passengers. Quite frankly, everyone else here at the hotel is quite relaxed."
She said staff at her hotel were "worried for their jobs", but also believed that once flight schedules returned to normal the tourist trade would return to normal levels too.
Since flights were suspended, it has been reported that British spies uncovered an Islamic State (IS) bomb plot in the region following the Russian airliner crash.
Prime Minister David Cameron said it was ''more likely than not'' the Russian aircraft was brought down in a terrorist attack.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here