Radio DJ Neil Fox exploited his fame to sexually abuse fans as young as 15 as well as colleagues, a court heard.
The 54-year-old is alleged to have sexually abused three girls aged under 16 between 1988 and 1996.
One of the complainants says she was 15 when Fox took her to an underground car park at Capital Radio in Euston in July 1988, and made her perform a sex act on him while he put his hand in her underwear.
Other girls allege that while at public events, the radio presenter kissed them, forcing his tongue into their mouths.
Another four allegations of indecent assault relate to females aged over 16.
Prosecutor John Price QC told Westminster Magistrates' Court that Fox was a well-known personality, known either as "Foxy" or "Dr Fox".
He said: "The prosecution alleges in this case that he has exploited the privilege conferred upon him by him fame to inflict his sexual actions upon women without regard either for their wishes or their age."
Mr Price continued: "He also inflicted himself upon adolescent girls - in other words, children."
Fox faces eight counts of indecent assault and two of sexual assault, all said to have taken place between 1988 and 2014.
At the beginning of the trial, Jonathan Caplan QC, defending Fox, asked if the star could sit beside his solicitor in court so he could pass notes if necessary.
Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle denied he request, saying it was in the "interest of fairness for all" for defendants to sit in the dock.
Fox, from Fulham, south-west London, was first arrested in September last year, then again in December and March.
He rose to fame presenting the chart show on Capital Radio, and was a judge on Pop Idol between 2001 and 2003 alongside Simon Cowell, Pete Waterman and Nicki Chapman.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article