A CENTRAL plank in Alex Salmond's economic case for independence last year has collapsed after new figures revealed Scotland is no longer wealthier than the rest of the UK.
Statistics published by the Scottish Government revealed gross domestic product per head, the main international measure of a nation's wealth, dipped 1.1 per cent below that of the UK over the first six months of the financial year.
It is believed to be the first time in 35 years Scotland has trailed the UK and shows the impact of the falling value of oil production to the country's economy.
The figures came as the University of Strathclyde's Fraser of Allander Institute revised its forecasts for economic growth downwards this year and next.
In a report, the think tank blamed weak productivity and poor exports for the slowdown.
The news that Scotland's GDP per head slipped below that of the UK will raise questions about the SNP's approach to a second independence referendum, should First Minister Nicola Sturgeon choose to call one in the near future.
Six months before the referendum, the Scottish Government used the national accounts to include Scotland in an international league table of wealthy nations.
Scotland was in 14th place, ahead of the UK in 18th, out of 34 developed countries.
Finance Secretary John Swinney and other senior Nationalists used the table to argue there was "no doubt that Scotland can more than afford to be a successful independent nation".
Yes Scotland launched a poster campaign based on the figures with the slogan: "What would you say to living in one of the world's wealthiest nations?"
The figures, which related to 2012, showed Scotland's GDP per head was 11 per cent higher than the UK as a whole.
But according to the latest national accounts, Scotland's GDP per head for the first six months of the current financial year was £14,213, compared with £14,371 for the UK, or 1.1 per cent lower.
The Scottish Government failed to update the OECD league table to include Scotland earlier this year, though had it done so Scotland would have remained above the UK.
Figures for 2014 showed Scotland's GDP per head was 2.1 cent higher than the UK's.
Scotland's performance compared with the rest of the UK has fallen dramatically since 2008, when GDP per head was 15 per cent higher.
John McLaren, an economist and honorary professor at Adam Smith business school at Glasgow university, said: "This looks bad but in reality it is not as dramatic as it looks because most of the extra North Sea money, which has kept Scotland's GDP per head higher than the UK's, goes overseas.
"However, as that is not the impression the Scottish Government has been giving, it makes it harder for them to make the sort of claims they have in the past.
"It shows the North Sea is not all that important any more."
Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's public services spokeswoman, said: "These figures are just another reminder of why the SNP should forget all about holding another independence referendum any time soon.
"This is further proof, if proof were needed, that Scotland is better off remaining as part of the UK.”
Murdo Fraser, enterprise spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives said: "These figures bring another pillar of the SNP's independence con crashing to the floor.
"If we had believed Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon last year we would now be less than six months away from leaving the UK - with barely any oil revenues and a lower GDP per capita."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said:
"Scotland has been consistently wealthier per head than the UK per for the last 35 years, and in the 12 months to June this year, GDP per head in Scotland was £28,514 – just £11 per person, or less than 0.04 per cent, lower than the UK figure.
"The fluctuation in GDP per head is due in part to global oil prices – but growth in Scotland’s onshore economy is forecast to pick up strongly in the years ahead."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel