Scots should have another referendum to keep them in the Union, a leading expert has suggested.
The vote would "endorse" the new powers going to Holyrood, according to John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University.
Without such backing from the public Unionists politicians were always going to be in a difficult position, he said.
His comments came as he gave evidence to the House of Lords Constitution committee.
Asked how Scotland could be kept in the Union, he told peers: “I think you should be holding a referendum on the provisions of the Scotland Bill going through this place.”
The vote would force ”the public to engage on the issue,” he said.
He added: “The truth is that it is perfectly clear simply having held a referendum and having 55 per cent in favour of staying inside the UK has not done anything nothing to quell the debate.
“ If you want to try and cement Scotland’s place in the Union then the Unionist side has to stop apparently running away from facing the public and be willing take what you want to do and get a positive endorsement.”
He went on: “If you get a situation with a majority voting for this then you can say not only did people vote against independence but people actually voted for this, this is what people in Scotland actually wanted.
In the absence of that kind of endorsement you are always going to be in a difficult position.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel