A man has been convicted of threatening to behead a Ukip election candidate.
Aftab Ahmed, 45, made the comment during a heated phone call with David Robinson-Young at the end of April, in the run-up to the general election.
The defendant denied a charge of making a threat to kill but was convicted following a trial at Newcastle Magistrates' Court.
Ahmed, of Heaton, will be sentenced tomorrow.
After the phone call, Mr Robinson-Young said he was left extremely concerned about his personal safety.
He said someone calling himself Mr Khan rang him after receiving a Ukip leaflet.
Mr Robinson-Young said he listened patiently for 20 minutes but warned the man he would put the phone down if he did not calm down.
The barrister, who specialises in employment law and discrimination cases, said at the time: "Mr Khan then swore at me saying, 'you had better f*** off or you will be beheaded next'."
Mr Robinson-Young added: "This caller was ranting on and on saying that the government supports bombing 'my Muslim brothers' abroad.
"If he had let me answer his questions I would have told him that I am the former legal officer for the Race Equality Office in Newcastle upon Tyne as well as working on behalf of Muslims many times."
Mr Robinson-Young, a 62-year-old former police officer, was Ukip's candidate in the Newcastle East constituency and came third, polling 4,910 votes
Following the hearing, Mr Robinson-Young felt "vindicated" after effectively being called a liar by the defendant.
The beheading threat, in the light of Lee Rigby's murder and IS's barbarous treatment of its captives, left the lawyer feeling cold, he said.
"Someone phoning up like that, in the light of what was going on in the world, with what happened to that poor soldier in London, and Jihadi John, meant I had to take it seriously," he said.
"Doing what I was doing at the time, knocking on doors throughout the constituency, meant I took it as a real threat."
He said he did not believe Ahmed would receive a jail sentence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here