King James' passion for jewellery has come to light in a 400-year-old manuscript.
Previously James VI of Scotland, he became the first Stuart king of England in 1603 taking over from Elizabeth I and a document recently uncovered in the University of Edinburgh details a list of jobs his jewellers were tasked with the year after his coronation, including decorating his armour with emeralds.
It outlines a series of repairs and embellishments to be carried out by the King's jewellers - Sir John Spilman and William Henrick - for himself and his wife Anne of Denmark.
Work completed on a number of brooches made up of gold feathers, which are depicted in a number of portraits of the King, are listed along with other pieces include a chain with diamonds and rubies, a jewel fashioned like "the bough of a tree".
Armour for the king was decorated with emeralds, garnets and sapphires, according to the document.
Techniques used by the jewellers, such as soldering, mending, trimming and setting, are also detailed.
The total cost for the work comes to £1,374, 14 shillings and one pence - approximately £140,000 in today's money.
The manuscript was discovered by archive staff completing a project to document the university's Laing Collection, hundreds of historic documents bequeathed to the university by antiquary and bookseller David Laing.
Archive manager Rachel Hosker said: "In 1604 the king and queen were in the public gaze as never before and, knowing how much they liked jewels, it is clear they were keen to impress.
"This rare document offers insight into this aspect of their lives at a pivotal time in British history."
History students on a number of courses at the University of Edinburgh will study the document as part of their courses and it can also be viewed by members of the public.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel