The head of Guy Fawkes's old school has called for an end to the "barbaric" act of setting fire to his effigy on Bonfire Night.
Leo Winkley said St Peter's, in York, will celebrate November 5 with fireworks as usual but will continue its tradition of shunning the burning of the Guy.
Mr Winkley said he thinks it is time for the rest of Britain to follow its lead.
He said: "Fundamentally, I just think it's time to move on.
"Nobody's condoning the way he tried to dismantle the instrument of democracy, nobody's condoning any of that, but he did pay the price, he felt the force of the law.
"The thing I do find a bit disturbing really is the idea of burning the effigy of anything."
Mr Winkley said he accepted Guy Fawkes was a convicted criminal who was executed for his role in the gunpowder plot.
"But, 400 years on, to still think that it's OK to chuck an effigy of him on top of a fire seems a bit barbaric, really.
"Also I don't think many people really understand it any more anyway."
Mr Winkley said the independent school - which was founded in 627AD and is said to be the fourth oldest school in the world - remembers its connection with Fawkes - who was a pupil at the end of the 16th century.
But he says they often choose to celebrate the achievements of other Old Peterites which include three current MPs and England cricketer Jonny Bairstow.
The headteacher said: "I don't want to be a party pooper. We have a fireworks display, which is great fun and gathers the community together. But you don't need the sinister element of burning an effigy."
He said: "We're just saying bonfires, fireworks, toffee apples - all of that is really good fun and it's a communal activity that now has it's own meaning and it doesn't need a Guy to confuse things."
Mr Winkley said he was also worried that, despite the modern take on Bonfire Night, the burning of the effigy had an undercurrent of religious intolerance.
He said: "Anything that expresses, or even hints at religious intolerance, surely in the 21 century we shouldn't be perpetuating that kind of activity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel