Young Scots should not have to follow the Proclaimers' lead and pen new songs describing fresh industrial decline, an SNP frontbencher has said.
Hannah Bardell said the band's 1987 song Letter From America encapsulated the problems faced by Scottish industry in the second half of the 20th century.
But the SNP's employment spokeswoman called on the Westminster Government to reveal how it will support UK steel through a "tumultuous period" to prevent further damage to Scotland's once proud "industrial heart".
Tata Steel announced last week that its Scottish sites - Dalzell in Motherwell and Clydebridge in Cambuslang - are to be mothballed with the loss of 270 jobs.
The plants are the only remaining steel works in Scotland although the Scottish Government hopes to find a buyer to take over production.
Livingston MP Ms Bardell said the long-term future of UK steel production will not be guaranteed by cuts to business rates, delayed emission deadlines or "prolonged protectionism" from the European Commission.
She recalled how the Clydebridge steelworks was first opened in 1887 as a "giant of industrial Scotland".
MPs heard the plant helped develop some of the world's most famous ships, including the Lusitania, Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth.
Speaking during a Labour-led opposition day debate on the steel industry, Ms Bardell told the Commons: "Scotland once had a proud and distinguished industrial heart. But I fear in much of the latter half of the 20th century, Scotland's industrial story became one of decline.
"This idea is encapsulated in a seminal hit by one of Scotland's favourite bands - and if you don't know them, you should listen - the Proclaimers.
"'Bathgate no more,' was the lyric as the Leyland plant closed in 1986. 'Linwood no more,' as the Hillman car factory closed. 'Methil no more,' as the fabrication yards that assembled the North Sea's greatest rigs closed.
"My own grandfather spent a good part of his career at Leyland and Bathgate and I don't want to see a new generation of Scots pen songs describing further decline in Scottish industry."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here