A FORMER college principal at the centre of a row over severance payments has launched an outspoken attack on Scotland's public spending watchdog.
John Doyle, the former head of Coatbridge College, in North Lanarkshire, accused Auditor General Caroline Gardner of making "vexatious statements" about him in a report on the college.
And both he and John Gray, the former chairman of the college, denied any wrongdoing in the way the severance payments were made to senior staff.
In June, Ms Gardner issued a highly-critical report of the severance deals - which included £304,000 to Mr Doyle.
The former Coatbridge College, in North Lanarkshire.
Ms Gardner said she believed Mr Doyle and Mr Gray had colluded in order to "achieve a certain outcome" by withholding important information from the college's remuneration committee.
Mr Doyle angrily refuted the claims during an evidence session held by the Scottish Parliament's public audit committee, which is investigating the payments.
He told MSPs the reputation of senior managers had been "absolutely trashed when we have done nothing wrong".
Mr Doyle said he had enjoyed an "unblemished career and reputation" during almost 40 years of public service up until the publication of the auditor general's report.
This included nine years as principal and chief executive of Coatbridge College, where Mr Doyle said he had been very proud to have been working with a professional and highly motivated team of managers, lecturers and support staff.
He said: "I take great exception to the conclusions reached and vexatious statements made by the auditor general about myself, John Gray and the senior team."
Mr Doyle also said Ms Gardner's accusations had been "totally unfounded", and that the severance packages had been based on a scheme that had been set out for staff in all four Lanarkshire colleges in the event of mergers.
And he said the potential conflict of interest had led him and the clerk to the board to "completely discharge our respective duties" at the point when the Scottish Funding Council and the Scottish Government raised concerns about the existence of two voluntary severance schemes.
The legal firm Biggart and Baillie had handled the issue, he said, because of the clear conflict of interests in him having any influence over the terms of his severance package.
Mr Gray, who also gave evidence to the committee, said he "totally rejected" the auditor general's conclusions, and questioned why she had made such "emphatic and terse conclusions without at least the courtesy of discussing the situation with the two people being criticised".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel