So-called legal highs worth £50,000 have been seized by Trading Standards officers after Edinburgh City Council became the first local authority to be granted confiscation orders.
Officers targeted 13 stores in the capital known to sell the chemicals, also known as new psychoactive substances (NPS), and eight voluntarily handed over their stock, worth a total of £50,000.
The council was granted forfeiture orders from the Sheriff Court that cover a large number of chemical substances and brand names, and could be extended to cover any NPS products for sale within Edinburgh.
It is the latest move in the council's campaign to stamp out the use of the products.
In a report to councillors in January this year, NPS were stated to be linked to a rise in physical and mental health issues, violence, anti-social behaviour and death.
Councillor Cammy Day, community safety leader, said: "This is a hugely important step in our bid to get rid of so-called legal highs.
"There is overwhelming evidence that they have a devastating effect on individuals as well as communities and we are grateful that the Sheriff Court agreed with the evidence that we presented to back this up.
"The granting of these orders has confirmed our suspicions that these products are dangerous and, as such, Trading Standards' officers now have the power to seize these potentially lethal substances from those who sell them.
"This is not just good news for Edinburgh, but Scotland as a whole. We will continue to work closely with Police Scotland to tackle the damage done by drugs, and NPS in particular, so that the health and well-being of citizens is protected."
Chief Superintendent Mark Williams said: "We're supporting our colleagues in Trading Standards to prevent the distribution of NPS in the capital and protect people from substances that are not safe.
"Edinburgh is the first local authority area in Scotland to have been granted an NPS forfeiture order.
"We have made it clear to a number of premises that if they do not comply with this order they can expect to face further action, including prosecution."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here