Help for claimants hit by proposed tax credits cuts will be set out in the Autumn Statement, George Osborne has announced after peers inflicted a crushing blow on the Government over the move.
The Chancellor bowed to pressure to put in place transitional measures following a double defeat in the House of Lords over the deeply divisive welfare reforms.
Mr Osborne criticised "unelected" Labour and Liberal Democrat peers for blocking the government on a financial measure and David Cameron is launching a "rapid review" into the constitutional fallout of the bruising result.
"David Cameron and I are clear that this raises constitutional issues that need to be dealt with," the Chancellor said.
"However, it has happened, and now we must address the consequences of that. I said I would listen and that's precisely that I intend to do.
"I believe we can achieve the same goal of reforming tax credits, saving the money we need to save to secure our economy, while at the same time helping in the transition.
"That is what I intend to do at the Autumn Statement. I am determined to deliver that lower welfare, higher wage economy that we were elected to deliver and the British people want to see."
Peers defied calls to respect a century-old convention that the unelected upper chamber does not block financial measures approved by the Commons, sparking claims of a "constitutional outrage".
A No10 spokesman said: "The Prime Minister is determined we will address this constitutional issue. A convention exists and it has been broken. He has asked for a rapid review to see how it can be put back in place."
Mr Osborne's political reputation has been left badly dented after he failed to see off the drubbing in the Lords despite stark warnings from across his own party in recent weeks about the impact the measures would have.
Labour's John McDonnell said people had been "shocked" over the way the Chancellor had pushed ahead with the changes, which will slash £4.4 billion from working tax credits and child tax credits for some of the country's poorest households.
The shadow chancellor said the result showed it was time for a "full and fair reversal" of the policy.
"George Osborne has got to think again," he told Sky News. "He has been defeated twice in the House of Lords tonight but there are a large number of Conservative MPs as well who have been telling him very, very clearly he has got to think again on this one.
"I think now he is going to have to come back with further proposals."
Peers backed a motion by a majority of 30 delaying the cuts until the Government responds to analysis of their impact by the Institute for Fiscal Studies and considers "mitigating action"
Minutes later the Government was defeated a second time, this time by a majority 17, on a Labour motion to delay the cuts until ministers come forward with "full transitional protection" for those affected for at least three years.
Conservative MP Michael Ellis said the result was a "constitutional outrage" as senior figures warned of serious repercussions.
But critics of the reforms defended the action taken by peer and called on the Chancellor to "grasp" the chance to redraw the plans.
Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said: "Peers have now given the Government a chance to think again, and the Chancellor should grasp that opportunity with both hands."
Liberal Democrat Leader Tim Farron said the Government had been "forced into an embarrassing climb down".
"George Osborne must now go back to the drawing board and come back with plans to balance the books that don't simply attack working families who are already struggling to get by," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel