A MAN is to face fraud charges for cheating his way into second place in Kenya's Nairobi International Marathon.
Police and race officials said the man, identified as 28-year-old Julius Njogu, hid among a group of spectators before joining Sunday's race near the finish.
Njogu claimed second place in a sprint finish after breezing past another competitor in the final stretch at the Nyayo National Stadium. He was in line to claim around 7,000 US dollars (£4,570) in prize money before being caught out and disqualified.
Officials said they became suspicious because Njogu showed no signs of fatigue and was not sweating when he had supposedly just run 26 miles (42km). They discovered that he had run barely half a mile (1km) after emerging from a bunch of onlookers and joining the leading group of runners just outside the stadium.
Over the last few yards, Njogu jogged easily past a weary-looking Shadrack Kiptoo to cross the line in second place. Joshua Kipkorir won the men's race in two hours, 13 minutes and 25 seconds. Elizabeth Rumokoi won the women's title in 2:29.32.
Television images showed Njogu arguing with race officials, and even removing his running shoes in an apparent attempt to show organisers blisters on his feet to prove he had run the entire course.
"I followed the leading team from start to finish and I didn't see him," said race director Ibrahim Hussein, a former Boston and New York Marathon champion. "He will not be recognised and I'm so disappointed that one can cheat in this modern age. He didn't finish second."
In 2013, two athletes were disqualified in the Nairobi marathon after also attempting to cheat their way to podium finishes in the women's race.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here