President Xi Jinping's state visit has cemented the UK's position as China's "best partner in the West", George Osborne declared as he defended ministers' failure to address human rights and other concerns in public.
The Chancellor said the benefits to Britain of a "mature" relationship with the "great nation" were clear in a series of new commercial deals signed during the stay - though confusion remained about their value.
Three days of red carpet wooing of Mr Xi aimed at fostering a "golden era" of relations with Beijing concluded with the football-mad leader being introduced to star players including Sergio Aguero at Manchester City.
He flew out of the country, with wife Madam Peng Liyuan, from the city's airport where he and David Cameron had unveiled new direct flights to the Chinese capital, operated by Hainan Airlines.
Downing Street issued a list of 36 commercial deals agreed during the visit which appeared to add up to around £34 billion - some way short of the nearly £40 billion trumpeted by Mr Cameron at a business dinner on Wednesday.
Among the biggest were a £6 billion Chinese investment in building two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point C, BP's agreement to supply £6.5 billion of liquefied natural gas over 20 years, and £1.56 billion of Rolls Royce aero engines.
Amid questions over the calculations, officials said the total included £6 billion set aside by Chinese investors for future commercialisation of results of an initial £1.5 billion tie up with Oxford University on regenerative medicine research.
Cheering supporters of Mr Xi - apparently partly stage managed by officials - again outnumbered protesters in Manchester demanding action to improve China's record on human rights.
Mr Cameron said he raised Beijing's abuses in private talks with the president, as well as other contentious issues such as the collapse of the UK's steel industry in the face of cheap Chinese imports and alleged "dumping".
The Chancellor rejected claims that the Government has been "kowtowing" to Beijing to secure its investment and had failed - unlike other European countries such as Germany - to discuss contentious issues openly.
"Whether it is long-term projects on nuclear power in the West Country, science in Manchester, manufacturing in Scotland, we've got billions of pounds of Chinese investment creating thousands of jobs in Britain," Mr Osborne told the BBC.
"And we've also now got a relationship where we can discuss difficult issues - whether it is the future of the steel industry, cyber security or indeed human rights - with the Chinese because we are having that dialogue.
"You can see the direct benefits in this country of that conversation: the 250,000 jobs that depend on Chinese investment and our relationship with that great nation.
"I want that to be strengthened so that we have the dialogue, we get the jobs and our economic plan delivers higher living standards for people here.
"We have a mature relationship with China and I think at the end of this week we have cemented that position of being China's best partner in the West precisely because we talk about a whole range of issues."
Questions were raised about the validity of a number of the figures claimed as new in the Government list.
One was a memorandum of understanding - said to be worth £1 billion - for the creation of a "Garden of Ideas" in China, which appeared to be a repeat of something signed at a Chinese investment conference in London in 2014.
Plans to open three House of Fraser shops in China following the £480 million acquisition of the department store chain by Chinese giant Sanpower last year - valued at £100 million on the list - were widely reported in April.
Financial Times analysis suggested the figure may have involved some "generous interpretation".
The Government said the value of a number of other deals - involving BP, Cambridge Education Limited, Merlin, Tang Culture Group, Uppingham School and BBC Worldwide - were withheld "due to commercial sensitivities or commercial confidentiality".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel