Theresa May has attacked the lack of black and minority ethnic officers and women in the police service, describing the situation at some forces as "simply not good enough".
In a speech to members of the National Black Police Association (NBPA), the Home Secretary said "diversity profiles" covering England and Wales showed no force has a black and minority ethnic representation reflecting its local population, while four forces have no black officers.
Mrs May told the association's annual conference in Birmingham: "These profiles, based on self-declared ethnicity data supplied by forces, give breakdowns for officers in each force by gender and ethnicity, compared against the local population.
"They reveal a hard truth - that no force has BME representation that matches its local demographic.
"Incredibly, this data shows that four forces do not employ any black, or black British, police officers at all, and female officers make up 28% of all police officers but 51% of the total population.
"This comes on top of existing statistics showing that there are only two chief officers who self-identify as BME in England and Wales, and 11 forces with no BME officers above even the rank of chief inspector."
The Home Secretary said she hoped the figures would act as a "wake-up call" to forces and provide chief constables with the information they need to identify areas for improvement, as well as for elected police and crime commissioners to hold them to account.
Data submitted to the Home Office, which are based on information officers declare themselves, suggest that as at March 31 the four forces with no black officers are Cheshire, Durham, North Yorkshire and Dyfed-Powys.
However, responding to Mrs May's speech Durham Police and Crime Commissioner Ron Hogg said it was "factually incorrect to say we have no black officers". Dyfed-Powys also said it has black officers.
Meanwhile, Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner Helen King disputed figures about the career prospects of black and minority ethnic officers.
On progression to senior ranks, she told BBC Radio 4's World At One: "I think the figures that have been quoted nationally today are wrong, in that I know within London I work with at least four chief officer colleagues who are from black and minority ethnic backgrounds."
The Equality and Human Rights Commission welcomed Mrs May's challenge, saying: "Britain is a diverse society and in order for the public to have full confidence in policing they need to see a service which is inclusive of all parts of the community."
The Home Secretary's address also led to renewed scrutiny of the possibility of fresh budget cuts for forces.
Shadow police minister Jack Dromey said: "It is right that the police must look like the people they serve if they are to gain the trust and support of communities.
"However, many forces in the UK have already said that under the severe cuts proposed by the Tories they will not be able to recruit until 2019 at the earliest.
"The police must act, but it is extremely difficult for forces to improve diversity and to carry on protecting communities whilst the Tories continue on their mission to slash police funding and hollow out the police service."
During her speech, the first by a Home Secretary to the NBPA's conference since 2003, Mrs May also slapped down Britain's most senior police officer in a row over the use of stop and search powers.
Claims that knife crime is rising as a result of curbs on the policing method are "simply not true", she said.
The comments put her publicly at loggerheads with Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, who suggested earlier this year that an increase in knife offences in London could be connected to reductions in stop and searches.
Her remarks drew a combative response from Scotland Yard, which accused the Home Office of "misunderstanding" its response to recent rises in knife crime and "our future intentions".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel