Many restaurants are still failing to serve fresh food or healthy choices to children - and price is no guarantee of quality, campaigners have found.
Children's menus were found to include potatoes pre-mashed in Holland, fish fingers pre-cooked in Poland and a chicken product with 19 additional ingredients produced variously in Kazakhstan, Russia, Vietnam, Argentina, Malaysia, India, Singapore, Indonesia, China, Ukraine and Slovakia, according to the Soil Association.
The study of 21 of the UK's most popular restaurant chains found significant improvements made by a small number of chains, but "continuing widespread poor practice with many restaurants failing to serve fresh food or healthy choices".
The majority of chains were not freshly preparing and cooking the majority of their food - more than half gave no indication of where their food came from and just one chain, Jamie's Italian, could reliably tell parents where their meat came from.
Cafe Rouge, Frankie & Benny's and Pizza Hut still offer children free or discounted refills of high calorie sugary drinks as standard, the Soil Association reported.
However, 10 of the chains are serving a portion of vegetables or salad with every meal, up from six chains in 2013, and nine include information on the menu about the origin of ingredients, up from five previously.
Angela Mitchell from Soil Association Scotland said; “‘Our 2015 league table includes big winners and big losers - adults expect to be offered real food and real choices in restaurants and we think children deserve the same.
"We’ve found some up-market eateries are designing menus that make healthy eating for children almost impossible, and price is no guarantee of quality - lower cost restaurants are outperforming more expensive chains.
"Since our first league table Harvester and Prezzo have proved it’s possible to make major improvements – we’re now calling on other restaurants to raise the bar and give our kids the food they deserve.”
Jamie Oliver's Jamie's Italian, which has two eateries in Glasgow and Edinburgh, topped the table with a score of 64 out of 80, up from 50 two years ago, and Prezzo was the biggest climber, moving up 13 places to sixth position.
Strada, KFC and Burger King were the three worst scorers, on 25, 21 and 11 respectively.
A survey in 2013 for the Soil Association found 40per cent of parents eat out with their children at least once a fortnight, but 66per cent of parents do not believe children's food in restaurants is good enough.
Anya Hart Dyke, one of the parents who reviewed restaurants in Scotland said: “It’s pretty stressful taking your child to a restaurant as it is - will there be room for the buggy? Will they have high chairs? Will I get a chance to eat my own meal or have to get take-out again? The last thing you expect to worry about is the food. What I feed my child is the single-most important consideration for me as a parent, after keeping her safe. It astounds me that for example one restaurant offered baked beans heavy with sugar and salt as an alternative accompaniment to vegetables, while the adult menu is often a great deal healthier.”
Soil Association spokesman Rob Percival said: "We've found some up-market eateries are designing menus that make healthy eating for children almost impossible, and price is no guarantee of quality - lower cost restaurants are outperforming more expensive chains."
Cafe Rouge brand director Georgia Hall said: "While we don't offer free or unlimited refills, we do offer refills for 75p on our choices of drinks for children, which include fruit juices, milk and cordials.
"In light of the debate over fizzy drinks, we will be reviewing this offer and indeed all of our kids' choices as we create our next menu in time for Christmas.
"We should highlight that our children's starters contain one portion of their five-a-day, as do three of our main courses and one of our desserts."
The survey was carried out as part of the Soil Association Scotland's Out to Lunch campaign.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel