The Government has not written off a "sugar tax" as a way of driving down childhood obesity, celebrity chef Jamie Oliver has said.
Oliver told MPs at the Commons health committee that Prime Minister David Cameron was reviewing all the evidence, adding there was a need to "maker sure he's brave".
He said his main role in front of the committee was "as a dad".
Of the need for a "sugar tax" and the Government's view, he said: "The discussions that I've had have not implied that that is written off.
"The discussions I've had are robust...Mr Cameron is reviewing everything.
"I think where he is positioned for the next five years...we need to make sure that he's brave."
He added that public polls on the need for a "sugar tax are favouring it quite strongly".
ADVERTISING
Asked what he would like to see in the Government's forthcoming obesity strategy, Oliver said: "I think my passion having worked with the British and international public for 17 years and having daily communications and monthly communication with millions of parents out there - is clarity.
"Honesty and clarity would be a really good balance.
"I don't believe the industry, particularly the food and drink industry, I don't think that utter clarity is their main objective because when you inform the British public with good, clear information they make good choices.
"They are not making good choices at the moment largely. I think it's a major problem."
Oliver said that before the general election there had been "no conversation" about the possibility of a tax.
He added: "I deeply feel passionate that parents of Britain and people involved in public health need to hold Mr Cameron to be brave and strong and support him otherwise the easiest thing, like minimum pricing on alcohol that had all the signs behind it, turns into a big old fight, they get burnt, they back off, they retreat when actually they were trying to do the right thing for public health."
Oliver said one of the most important thing was a government "that's willing to fight tooth and nail for public health and child health."
He added: "I do believe we need one strong hard action to be made, that is the sugar tax, and everything else will cascade off that beautifully."
Oliver said he believed the Government was still open to a tax and that Mr Cameron sees the issue of childhood obesity as "very important".
On industry, he said: "A tax does remind them who's boss, and that is child health and the Government."
Cereals, sugar-sweetened drinks and highly-processed foods "are major contributors in the excess" in people's diets, Oliver said.
He said there was a need for "something radical" to slow the rising rates of childhood obesity.
Sugar-sweetened drinks are the biggest source of sugar in children's diets, he said.
Oliver said "doing nothing is inappropriate" and that manufacturers of sugar-sweetened drinks had "hijacked" the Olympics and football matches.
He said there was a need to be "big and bold" adding: "Who is it that's running the country?
"Is it businesses who are profiting from ill health in our children, or is it us?"
Oliver said he had suggested that a three-year sugar tax should be introduced to see how it worked.
"My suggestion to the Government is that we should implement a three-year sugary drink tax of 20% per litre, which is seven pence on a regular can of soda, and that we should absolutely interrogate it and put a sunset clause on it."
He said the tax would then be removed if it had not been shown it was "symbolic" and resulted in a drop-off in sales.
"I'm fully confident that the narrative of benefit to British children would be clear as as bell. But I also realise that if it wasn't, it would be removed."
He said obesity was also putting a huge strain on the NHS, adding: "Being gentle, being polite is not a way to have a progressive obesity strategy.
"We need to be big, bold brave and frankly, act like a parent."
Oliver said having the industry voluntarily reduce sugar was "not working".
During the session, Oliver handed out sugary drinks that he had doctored to make sugar levels much more clear.
He said he had worked out how many teaspoons were in each of the drinks, which included 14 teaspoons of sugar in a bottle of Pepsi and 13 in a bottle of Ribena.
He said he wanted to empower British parents to see what their children were drinking.
"The reason industry do not want you to have that is that the impact is visceral."
Oliver said online was a "minefield" for advertising junk food to children, and was a "bigger problem" than TV.
"It's open territory," he said, adding that online was "not policed".
Setting out his shopping list of demands for action, he said TV adverts for junk food should be banned before 9pm to stop them appearing during major family shows.
He said: "We should not be advertising junk food before 9pm, end of story.
"You can watch Britain's Got Talent and there will be up to 13 advertisement for unhealthy food within that time. Under the circumstances it's inappropriate."
Oliver added that one of the things that upset him was energy drinks in lunchboxes.
"There is no standard for lunchboxes," he said.
Earlier, Oliver accused successive Governments of failing children.
The TV star has been campaigning for a levy of sugary drinks, amassing almost 150,000 signatures of a petition demanding a Commons debate.
He told the committee: "The Government over the last 30 years has done an incredible disservice to children with regards to creating an environment where making a better choice is easy or easier."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here