BBC Scotland’s health correspondent Eleanor Bradford has spoken out about her experience as an adoptive mum, as she backed an appeal for more would-be parents to consider adopting older children.
The TV news reporter and her partner Ross are adoptive parents to two brothers, William and Edward, who were aged four and seven, when they were placed with the couple two years ago. The couple were actively seeking older children, but many families do not consider them, according to adoption agencies.
Ms Bradford said she had been surprised how quickly the boys were placed with them, after they were approved to adopt. “They came to see us the next day and asked us if we’d like to see photos of William and Edward. We know a lot of parents who have had to wait a long time to adopt, but for us it was panic as we hadn’t expected it to happen so soon."
Eleanor said there it was sad for older children that some adoptive parents automatically rule them out: “You can’t pick them up and swing them around like a toddler but you can have even more fun with them," she said. "I’d definitely recommend adopting older children.”
Statistics published by information service First4Adoption reveal that the average age of children waiting to be placed in adoptive families is four. Older children are often likely to be in sibling groups or to have additional needs and there is currently a shortage of adoptive parents coming forward for these children.
Ms Bradford added: “It’s a shame there’s a myth that with older children that ‘the damage is done’, because that’s not our experience at all.”
Hugh Thornbery, Chief Executive of Adoption UK, said: “We believe all children can enjoy positive futures.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel