A SILENT protest has been held in support of a local postman who has not been given his job back, despite winning a case for his unfair dismissal.
David Mitchell was accused of stealing greeting cards with money and gift vouchers, and was dismissed in December last year even though bosses found no clear evidence against him.
He had previously spent 17 years on the route around Ceres, Craigrothie, Cults and Chance Inn, and 27 years in total in service with Royal Mail.
Mr Mitchell won an employment tribunal against the delivery firm, with a recommendation from employment judge Ian McFatridge that Royal Mail reinstate him.
In a written judgment on the case, he said: "The employer did not have reasonable grounds on which to sustain their belief in the claimant's guilt.
"There were simply insufficient grounds to come to that view. It therefore follows that the decision to dismiss is unfair."
Now customers of Mr Mitchell held a silent protest outside the Royal Mail delivery office in Cupar, Fife, in anger that he has not yet been given his job back.
Mr Mitchell, who reportedly did not attend the protest, said: "My customers want me back to work and the silent protest is about them wanting to put their point across.
"To me, Royal Mail have got it completely wrong. Their investigation has been a shambles. If things had been done properly I'd still be in a job. It's just ridiculous.
The tribunal judge has said I should be reinstated. All I can say is, 'I didn't do it'. It's been absolutely horrible.
"I would like to go back. At my age it's going to be difficult to get another job."
A Royal Mail spokeswoman said: "Royal Mail have studied the judgment in this case.
"The tribunal have now listed this matter for a reconsideration hearing in November to consider the reinstatement of this ex-employee."
Mr Mitchell has a 'Deliver Justice' page on Facebook and has established a petition on change.org in regards to judges' decisions being final in UK employment law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here