The Government has welcomed Barack Obama's commitment to keep thousands of US troops in Afghanistan.
The US President has announced plans to keep nearly 10,000 troops in Afghanistan through most of next year and 5,500 when he leaves office in 2017.
Mr Obama had previously promised to end the war during his term in office, with only a small force based in the Embassy beyond 2016.
He called the new war plan a "modest but meaningful" extension of the US military mission in Afghanistan.
A UK Government spokesman said: "We welcome the announcement that the US will maintain its current military footprint in Afghanistan into 2016. It sends a clear message of enduring commitment to the Afghan Government and to Afghanistan's long term security.
"The UK is committed to promoting Afghanistan's stability and prosperity through our financial, political and military assistance, which includes contributing to the development of future Afghan leaders at the officer academy in Kabul and delivering a vital role for Nato's Resolute Support Mission HQ."
Explaining his U-turn, Mr Obama said that while Afghan forces have made progress, the security situation in the country remains fragile.
The US will maintain the current force of 9,800 troops in Afghanistan through most of next year, then draw down to 5,500 troops in 2017, at a pace still to be determined after consultation with commanders.
It will be up to Mr Obama's successor - the third president to oversee the US presence in Afghanistan - to decide how to proceed from there.
"I suspect that we will continue to evaluate this going forward, as will the next president," Mr Obama said.
The decision is likely to make Afghanistan a major issue in the Democrat and Republican campaigns for the White House.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel