The elections watchdog will not be launching a full investigation into “malicious” claims the SNP illegally colluded with a pro-independence business group before last year's referendum.
The Electoral Commission said there was no evidence to support the claims.
The practice would been illegal under the 2013 Scottish Independence Referendum Act (SIRA). The SNP and BFS dismissed the claims as nonsense.
The Commission said it had “found no evidence during its assessment that the SNP and BFS worked together in a way that broke the law. There is therefore no need to open a full investigation”.
It explained: “Under SIRA, if campaigners worked together under an ‘agreed plan’, spending related to this plan would count towards each campaigner’s spending limits. The Commission found no evidence that BFS and the SNP were operating under such a plan.”
The watchdog added: “Should further information come to light, the Commission will consider this but at this stage no further action will be taken.”
She has denied any wrongdoing and withdrew from the SNP whip when a police investigation was launched.
A BFS spokesman said: “These were malicious and sensationalist claims made by the Unionist press hoping to damage the Yes movement and we welcome the Commission’s confirmation that we acted entirely properly.”
Stressing how the group was never in any doubt it had acted within the law, he added: “They told us that speaking with, sharing a platform with and getting updates from other Yes groups was, not only within the rules, they expected us to do so."
An SNP spokesman said: “This confirms what we have said throughout, as the Electoral Commission guidance makes clear, informal discussions with other campaigners are not covered by the provisions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel