David Cameron has avoided calls to explain if he is "telling porkies" over billionaire peer Lord Ashcroft's tax status.
Call Me Dave by Lord Ashcroft and journalist Isabel Oakeshott alleges Mr Cameron was aware the peer had not given up his controversial "non dom" tax status when he joined the House of Lords earlier than was previously admitted.
Labour's Kevin Brennan also mocked the Prime Minister by joking about another allegation contained in the unauthorised biography, which claimed Mr Cameron participated in a stunt while at Oxford University involving a dead pig and "a private part of his anatomy".
Sources close to Mr Cameron have previously dismissed this claim as nonsense.
The PM replied by offering to lend his free copy of Lord Ashcroft's book to Mr Brennan in order to prevent anyone receiving royalties.
Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions, Cardiff West MP Mr Brennan asked Mr Cameron: "Can you help clear something up for the House and the country and it concerns the recent biography of you by Isabel Oakeshott?
"In it Lord Ashcroft says he told you in 2009 about his non dom tax status and yet in 2010 you said you didn't know the detail of Lord Ashcroft's tax status.
"Clearly someone is telling porkies. Is it you or Lord Ashcroft?"
Mr Cameron replied: "What I'd say to you is I would think of many better uses of your time than reading that book.
"I managed to procure a free copy and in order not to give anyone royalties I'll gladly lend you a copy if that's what you'd like.
"I think you'll remember in this House, Labour and Conservative agreed to legislate so that non doms could not sit in either House - legislation I fully supported and indeed suggested at the time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel