Junior doctors have demanded "concrete assurances" from the Health Secretary, saying the "threat" that a contract will be imposed upon them must be removed.
In response to a letter from Jeremy Hunt last week, the head of the junior doctors' committee at the British Medical Association (BMA) indicated doctors will not budge on their demands for Saturdays to be paid at a higher rate.
Under the current plans, the contract will reclassify doctors' normal working week to include Saturdays and up to 10pm every night of the week except Sunday.
Medics argue they will lose out financially as evenings and Saturdays will be paid at the standard rate rather than a higher rate.
Mr Hunt said last week he would be pleased to discuss how far a normal working week would extend on Saturdays.
He guaranteed the contract would not impose longer hours on doctors and that the "great majority" of doctors would not lose out financially.
But in his reply, Dr Johann Malawana said there was a need for stronger words from Mr Hunt.
He said: "Our first concrete assurance centres on the withdrawal of the threat to impose a new contract.
"Your letter makes no mention of this, so we continue to seek urgent clarification from you as to whether the government still intends to persist with its timetable for the imposition of a new contract."
He said it remained the BMA's position that "work on Saturdays and late evenings cannot be considered as exactly the same as daytime on a weekday".
Furthermore, Dr Malawana said Mr Hunt's assurance that most junior doctors would be at least "as well paid" as they are now means, by definition, "that some junior doctors will receive a pay cut".
He went on: "I have spoken to many junior doctors across the country, who are telling me that they are becoming increasingly disillusioned and I believe this may have an impact on the career choices they are making in the UK and globally.
"Our concern is that this puts in jeopardy your manifesto commitment to deliver a seven-day NHS."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here