David Cameron has been warned by his general election guru that the Tories risk losing power in 2020 unless they cut immigration, according to a new book.
Lynton Crosby, the Australian political consultant widely credited with delivering the surprise victory, questioned a selected group of 2,000 people in the weeks after polling day to find out why they voted for Mr Cameron.
He found voters believed the party had been regarded as "best able to manage the economy, spending and debt" and offering "strong and stable government" in contrast to a potential Labour-SNP coalition.
Increasing NHS spending, delivering an EU referendum and clearing the deficit were also listed as priorities.
But Mr Crosby found that the policy area the group wanted Mr Cameron to address above all others was migration.
The strategist presented results of the confidential poll to the new Cabinet during the summer.
He told ministers that keeping the promise to "control and reduce immigration" would be crucial to winning the 2020 election.
The warning emerged in Why The Tories Won, written by Telegraph journalist Tim Ross and published by Biteback.
Other details revealed include the frustration of Ed Miliband's team at his "grumpiness" early in the morning, which meant morning strategy meetings had to be scheduled some two hours later than the Tories held theirs.
The notorious photographs of the Labour leader eating a bacon sandwich were blamed on the fact that Mr Miliband was not a "morning person" and rejected advice to wait to eat his breakfast.
There is also a suggestion that Mr Miliband was the driving force behind the interview with Russell Brand. The comedian initially offered a simple endorsement but Labour wanted to show that Mr Miliband had worked to win him over.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here