DEVELOPERS trying to build a controversial six-turbine wind farm on the edge of a world-famous landscape claim its refusal undermines the integrity of Scotland's planning system.
The owners of the German wpd.group have launched a legal challenge in the Court of Session against the decision by a Scottish Government planning reporter to refuse permission for the development by Glen Affric.
Wpd claims “unverified online submissions to the planning portal have undoubtedly influenced the decision making process”.
The firm had earlier appealed to the Scottish Government following repeated delays by the Highland Council in considering their application.
But they say they were shocked by the decision in July of the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) reporter Richard Hickman to dismiss their appeal.
They claim the decision on their Beinn Mhor development has “severe impacts on the integrity of the Scottish planning system".
The turbines would had been almost 400ft to blade tip near the acclaimed glen, which lies in the middle of the large area of land between Loch Ness in the east and Loch Duich on the west coast.
The project was opposed by the wild land charity the John Muir Trust, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, two local community councils and over 1,000 members of the public.
But Kyla Donaldson, wpd Scotland’s project manager, said their appeal had been dismissed against the recommendation of all technical consultees involved in the planning application.
She said that the head of planning at Highland Council had recommended approval. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) had said it could be “accommodated” as “the likely effects on the appreciation of the special qualities of the Glen Affric National Scenic Area (NSA) would not be significant”.
She said SNH had also concluded that it was unlikely to adversely affect the Glen Affric to Strathconon Special Protection Area (SPA), a designated site of international importance for golden eagles.
“Mr Hickman, a self-employed reporter at the DPEA, overturned the professional assessments and recommendation by the Highland Council’s planning department, the Scottish Government’s environmental agency SNH and the reports of over a dozen specialists who have worked on the planning application for almost two years" she said.
“The DPEA is struggling to explain how a reporter who has no professional qualification as a landscape architect or traffic and transport specialist can mock the entire Scottish planning system.
“Whether one supports wind energy or not – the DPEA’S Reporter has issued a purely arbitrary decision which has revealed to members of the public, local groups with an interest in the project as well as the developer that the planning system is wide open to bias."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “The reporter appointed by Scottish Minsters set out his reasons concerning this case in his decision notice. As an appeal against the decision has been made to the Court of Session, it would be inappropriate to comment further.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel