CONCERNS have been raised over the funding of private school places for military personnel by the Ministry of Defence.
Some £84 million of public money was spent last year by the MoD on sending the children of service personnel to top private schools such as Fettes, Gordonstoun, Eton and Wellington.
Most of those benefitting from the subsidy are officers rather than rank-and-file soldiers, sailors and airmen and eight out of 10 recipients are based in Britain rather than overseas.
Douglas Chapman, an SNP MP who sits on the Defence Select Committee, said: "I was surprised to learn that many of those who take advantage of this subsidy are not serving abroad on long tours of duty, where perhaps an educational continuity allowance could be justified, but most claimants are based here in the UK.
"In addition, many taxpayers will be concerned that those who are on the highest salary bands, through all the officer ranks, are those who are more likely to take advantage of this subsidy with those in the lowest ranks proportionately least likely to benefit.
"At a time when the public finances are under huge strain this is surely time for those with the broadest shoulders to bear the costs of privately educating their own children and not expecting the ordinary tax payer to take on the burden."
Mr Chapman said he had asked the chair of the committee to suggest ways the Westminster Government could save money by altering the conditions in which military officers become eligible for the subsidy.
The allowance is worth between £9,087 and £30,252 a year per child, depending on their age and whether they have special educational needs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel