Labour's shadow Scottish secretary has defended his party's decision to avoid a debate on the renewal of Trident nuclear weapons - which both he and his leader oppose.
Just 7% of Labour delegates at the party conference in Brighton voted for a debate on Trident, meaning it was shelved in favour of debates on issues such as the NHS, the refugee crisis, mental health and housing.
Shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray said new Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn wants to introduce more "straightforward" politics to the Labour Party.
Yesterday's decision means Labour's standing support for the renewal of the Clyde-based weapons, which was reaffirmed under Ed Miliband, will remain party policy but Mr Corbyn and the party's only Scottish MP will continue to voice their own personal opposition.
Mr Murray has said he will not vote for renewal even if the party continues to support it when the issue comes to the vote at Westminster next year.
Scottish Labour is preparing to have its own debate on Trident at its conference next month.
Speaking from Brighton on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, Mr Murray said: "The party's position is very clearly the renewal of Trident.
"The party yesterday, the delegates that are here, voted not to have that particular debate this week, and Jeremy has said quite clearly that he wants to open up this party to a much more democratic process and that democratic process spoke yesterday."
He added: "The public has to take Labour's position, which is still the current position of the Labour Party and the national policy forum which set the manifesto and the agenda for the last election.
"Jeremy has said quite clearly he wants to persuade the party, the shadow cabinet of the Parliamentary Labour Party, the wider membership and indeed the country that we shouldn't be renewing Trident.
"He has been pretty clear that he wants to have that debate and that argument, but it is not happening because the membership of a democratic party has voted not to have that.
"Only 7% of the 10,000 people that are here this week voted to have that debate on Trident.
"I think we have to listen to that process and I don't see what's wrong with that.
"My position on Trident has not changed. I will not support the renewal of Trident.
"My party leadership has changed, my party is changing, the Scottish party is changing, my view on Trident has not changed and I will not vote to support it.
"I have had the view for a long time, Jeremy shares that view, others in the shadow cabinet don't.
"If we all supported the same positions it would certainly make democracy a much less important part of British life, and I think we should welcome the debate.
"This is about a new straightforward, straight-talking honest politics that Jeremy wants to put to the public and I think it's pretty healthy and something that we should welcome to have that debate."
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said it is "hugely disappointing" that Labour will not debate Trident at its conference this week.
Speaking after a Scottish Council for Development and Industry event in Edinburgh, Ms Sturgeon told Bauer Radio: "I think there was a huge opportunity for Labour this week to look again at the issue of renewal of Trident.
"£100 billion is better spent on health and education, on opportunities for young people for the future rather than on a new generation of weapons of mass destruction.
"I think the question that comes out of the decision not to debate it this week is that, on Trident, is it a case of Labour changing Jeremy Corbyn rather than Jeremy Corbyn changing Labour?
"I think a lot of people hoped that Jeremy Corbyn would change Labour, and I think they will look at this decision this week and be quite disappointed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel