NATURE is supposed to test the survival of the fittest - so what happens when the heartstrings of wildlife camera crews are tugged?
The film-makers behind some of the BBC's most famous natural history shows, including Scottish cameraman Doug Allan, have admitted helping distressed animals in certain scenarios as they revealed the battle to remain objective observers.
Speaking at the Radio Times Festival in London, Dunfermline-born Mr Allan, who is Sir David Attenborough's favourite cameraman, said: "For me, at least, my job is to look and not interfere. If I feel my presence is tilting the balance of the predator or the prey, then I'm doing something wrong.
"I was in a penguin colony once and there were big melt holes developing in the ice. And a little emperor chick had fallen in a hole. So of course what do you do?
"You pick it up and put it out. Of course it will probably just go and fall in another one, but at least you've helped its chances to survive.
"On the other hand, if you see a bunch of petrels attacking a chick then you just have to leave it, because the giant petrel is as entitled to his meal as any other animal."
Alice Hunter, a wildlife photographer, said Mr Allan had the "right idea" while others urged them to "intervene more".
“As humans kill so much of nature, a few small interventions is hardly changing any ‘balance’," said Twitter user Mike Hamblett.
John Tweedie, a student of natural sciences from Glasgow, wrote: “I’m in the ‘do not interfere’ camp but them helping is no different from us helping a chick that’s fallen out of the nest. We should never interfere where it’s a predator-prey interaction. But if it’s the last few of a species being hunted…”
Another social media user wrote: “We can't choose which will live and which will die based on which ones are cuddliest.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here