Smartphone health apps backed by the NHS could be putting users' privacy "unnecessarily at risk", according to a new study.
Researchers from Imperial College London investigated how data was handled by apps endorsed by the NHS Health Apps Library and found several sent unencrypted personal and medical information over the internet - putting users at risk of identity theft and fraud.
They said the findings questioned the "trustworthiness" of NHS accreditation at a time when health apps covering a wide range of topics from weight loss to pregnancy were used by an estimated half a billion people across the world.
It comes after the Government announced that patients could soon access their medical records on a smartphone and urged on the NHS to adopt more mobile technology.
The library features applications which are reviewed by the health service "to ensure they are clinically safe" and comply with the Data Protection Act, according to the NHS Choices website.
But a test of 79 apps listed on the service over a six month period in 2013 found that 70 transmitted data over the internet and 38 had a specific privacy policy which did not state what information would be sent.
The study, published in the journal BMC Medicine, also found 23 sent identifying details without protection, of which four apps sent both personal and medical information unencrypted.
The researchers used a form of hack known as a "man-in-the-middle attack" to capture the data sent by an app over the internet.
Lead researcher Kit Huckvale said: "It is known that apps available through general marketplaces had poor and variable privacy practices, for example, failing to disclose personal data collected and sent to a third party.
"However, it was assumed that accredited apps - those that had been badged as trustworthy by organisational programs such as the UK's NHS Health Apps Library - would be free of such issues."
"Our study suggests that the privacy of users of accredited apps may have been unnecessarily put at risk, and challenges claims of trustworthiness offered by the current national accreditation scheme being run through the NHS.
"The results of the study provide an opportunity for action to address these concerns, and minimise the risk of a future privacy breach. To help with this, we have already supplied our findings and data to the NHS Health Apps Library."
Earlier this month Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said his ambition was to get 15% of NHS patients routinely reading and adding to their online medical records using smartphones apps within the next 12 months.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here