Panic in the offices of Penguin? The publisher has just released the first novel of former Smiths singer Morrissey. And the early reviews of List of the Lost have not been kind. And that’s putting it kindly.
The slim book, which is set in Boston, concerns itself with a college sports relay team. The author has himself said of it, “the theme is demonology … the left-handed path of black magic.” Its critics, however, have been lining up to damn the result.
The Guardian’s Michael Hann was the most scathing. “All those who shepherded it to print should hang their heads in shame, for it’s hard to imagine anything this bad has been put between covers by anyone other than a vanity publisher,” he wrote. He went on to describe the novel as “the stale excrement of Morrissey’s imagination,” and told prospective readers not to “sully” themselves with it.
Meanwhile the Daily Telegraph opted to publish an article headlined “the 10 most embarrassing lines” and regular Herald contributor Julie McDowall tweeted: “There are some appalling sentences in the new Morrissey novel. How can this be the man who wrote How Soon Is Now?”
The novel’s sex scenes have been singled out for ridicule. It’s possible the singer may find himself nominated for next year’s Bad Sex in Fiction award.
List of the Lost is not Morrissey’s first book of course. In October 2013 he published his memoir, entitled Autobiography, published under the Penguin Classics imprint at its author’s insistence. Autobiography was an instant success, selling almost 35,000 copies in its first week in print.
Autobiography even managed to get some good reviews too. Indeed, the celebrated literary critic Terry Eagleton was among its fans, even suggesting that Morrissey could even be a future Booker Prize winner.
If List of the Lost appears on the Booker Prize longlist next year, however, Britain’s literary critics might well explode.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here