He is undoubtedly one of the more literary pop stars of our time, with allusions to Oscar Wilde, Shelagh Delaney and Keats permeating some of his best-loved songs.
But if reviews of his debut novel are anything to go by, Morrissey should perhaps stick to making music.
The novel, List of Lost, published by Penguin, and out today, has been described by the Guardian as an “unpolished turd of a book”.
“Do not read this book; do not sully yourself with it, no matter how temptingly brief it seems,” wrote the paper’s Michael Hann. “All those who shepherded it to print should hang their heads in shame, for it’s hard to imagine anything this bad has been put between covers by anyone other than a vanity publisher.
“It is an unpolished turd of a book, the stale excrement of Morrissey’s imagination.”
And it seems the Guardian is not the only publication to trash the work of the controversial former Smiths frontman.
Nico Hines of online publication the Daily Beast describes the writing as “laughably chunky” and the characters as “thinly drawn”. But he claims the worst aspect is the “extraordinary tone of misogyny that pervades the entire story”.
Morrissey himself described the book, which tells of a track relay team which is haunted by a demon, as an “American tale where, naturally, evil conquers good and none live happily ever after”.
The singer, 56, uses the book to address many of his most well-known and long-held bete noirs, including the royal family, Margaret Thatcher and the meat industry.
Two years ago, Penguin controversially published Morrissey’s autobiography in its “classic” imprint, which is usually reserved for esteemed dead writers.
The book divided the critics, with some praising its brilliance and others decrying it as overwrought and self-indulgent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel