AN assistant chief constable accused of cheating on a command course will learn his fate next week.
Police Scotland's Wayne Mawson will go before a closed meeting of Scottish Police Authority's complaints and conduct committee next Thursday.
The specially convened meeting will decide whether Mr Mawson is to face an investigation for misconduct or gross misconduct- which would be carried out by another body, the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner.
The decision could have a huge impact on the career of Mr Mawson, who is seen as a close ally of outgoing chief constable Sir Stephen House, and a champion of controversial stop and search targets.
Mr Mawson has been accused of passing off a subordinate's work as his own as he tried to secure the qualification necessary to keep his job.
The potentially career-ending allegations were formally referred to the SPA, the force's main civilian watchdog, this summer.
That came after an internal inquiry by Police Scotland's Counter-Corruption Unit following an anonymous tip-off.
The referral to the authority was made by Deputy Chief Constable Neil Richardson. Although unproven, the allegations sent shockwaves through the highest ranks in Police Scotland.
The accusations of cheating relate to Mr Mawson's attendance at the UK College of Policing's prestigious Strategic Command Course (SCC) in Sunningdale, Berkshire, earlier this year.
Normally an assistant chief constable would be expected to have already passed the two-month Sunningdale course or an equivalent before taking up their post.
However, Mr Mawson was appointed ACC, with responsibility for community policing in western Scotland, without having completed the command course. He graduated in March, at his first attempt, two years after being appointed.
One of the tasks at the course was to design a new system for dealing with a particular branch of policing. It is alleged that Mr Mawson submitted work carried out by an officer under his command.
That officer is not thought to be under investigation.
It is understood that all command course candidates had signed a document saying all work would be their own.
The SPA's job is not to decide whether they are true or not; it is to assess whether the allegations, if they were proven, would amount to misconduct or gross misconduct.
The complaints and conduct committee, chaired by former Highland councillor Ian Ross, must assess whether such allegations, if true, would pass that test. The Police Investigations and Review Commissioner Kate Frame. Ms Frame's team would then judge the factual merits of the allegations.
Police Scotland cannot judge the merits of complaints against its own chief officers. These must be referred to SPA and, if they relate to alleged misconduct, PIRC.
The consequences for officers found guilty of misconduct or gross misconduct are extremely serious and include dismissal or demotion.
An SPA spokeswoman said: "Consideration of complaints and conduct issues are confidential and the SPA has a policy of not commenting on individual cases."
Police Scotland did not wish to comment.
The SPA has also received another complaint about Mr Mawson's appointment as assistant chief constable or ACC in 2013.
This comes from Angela Wilson, who served as an ACC in the old Tayside force. She is complaining about Sir Stephen, not Mr Mawson. Specifically, she says it was unfair that Mr Mawson was give the as one of House’s top lieutenants before completing the command course.
Ms Wilson retired early from the new single force, claiming she was marginalised by the new management.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel