Campaigners have called for an investigation into the UK car industry after Volkswagen was found to have cheated clean-air rules in the US.
Chief executive of the British Lung Foundation, Dr Penny Woods, claimed "most new cars" do not meet European emissions standards in "real world" testing.
"Although the Volkswagen scandal is particularly astounding, the problem of unreliable emissions data runs deeper than the actions of one manufacturer," she said.
"Compulsory, independent, real-world testing is therefore essential, so that consumers have trustworthy, accurate information on the pollution and health risks of their vehicle before buying."
In April Supreme Court justices in London ordered that "air quality plans" to comply with European Union law on limits for nitrogen dioxide must be submitted to the European Commission by the end of the year.
The lawyer who represented environmental group ClientEarth in court, Alan Andrews, said he was not surprised by the Volkswagen revelations.
"We have always known diesel is a killer and now we have a smoking gun," he explained.
"We want to see the UK Government launch an immediate investigation to see whether cars being driven on Britain's roads are cheating on EU air regulations."
The scandal comes in the wake of Government proposals to restrict diesel cars from going into city centres.
Steve Gooding, director of motoring research charity the RAC Foundation, warned that the UK's 11 million diesel drivers would be confused by just how much technology to make the vehicles cleaner has improved.
He added: "It is ironic that while diesel cars have been under scrutiny from politicians for air quality reasons the biggest blow to their reputation might have come from a company that makes millions of them.
"We know diesel cars don't perform as well on the road as in the lab but this has been put down to the limitations of the test cycle rather than possible manipulation by manufacturers.
"The whole testing regime is currently being overhauled. This fiasco shows how urgently that overhaul is needed if trust is to be restored."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel