BT will aim for higher minimum broadband speeds generally as well as tackling slow speeds in hard-to-reach parts of the country, its chief executive has pledged.
Gavin Patterson said BT was committed to helping to deliver a new universal minimum broadband speed of 5 to 10 megabits per second (Mbps) for homes and businesses - enough for everyone in the UK to use popular internet services such as high-definition video.
BT has come under attack from its rivals, which have said the ownership of the national telecoms network by BT Openreach has led to a "substandard experience" for consumers. Calls have been made for the competition watchdog, which has strong powers to shake up markets, to step in.
As well as the aim of a new minimum universal broadband speed, BT also plans to start upgrading homes and smaller businesses with "superfast" speeds to "ultrafast" technology. It said that 10 million premises will receive ultrafast broadband with speeds of 300 to 500 Mbps by the end of 2020.
Mr Patterson, who said that new technologies being developed by BT should help boost slow speeds in many areas, added that there would need to be "a supportive regulatory and government policy environment" in order to "bring about a commercially viable investment".
Mr Patterson said: "We want to forge an ultrafast future for Britain and stand ready to help government deliver the broadband speeds necessary for every property to enjoy modern day internet services, such as high-definition TV streaming and cloud computing.
"To achieve this, we need a collaborative effort across industry and government."
The announcements follow pressure from BT's rivals and others for a radical shake-up of the broadband market.
A spokesman for Sky said of today's announcements: "What the British broadband market urgently needs is radical reform, not calculated manoeuvring and caveats to protect BT's self-interest.
"Only a truly independent Openreach will unlock the investment, innovation and competition required to deliver the digital connectivity of the future."
A TalkTalk spokesman said that for many, the plans announced by BT will come as "too little and too late".
He said: "If the industry is to reach its full potential we need a level playing field that encourages competing providers to roll out the ultrafast infrastructure of the future."
The chief executives of Sky, TalkTalk and Vodafone UK have been among those highlighting an "urgent need for increased competition" in the sector, so that alternative providers are encouraged to invest and innovate.
They were among those who put their names to a letter in the Financial Times, which said that the ownership of the national telecoms network by BT Openreach has led to a "substandard experience for millions of customers and diminished opportunity for alternative providers to compete effectively".
The letter, which was also signed by the Institute of Directors, said that the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) should undertake a full investigation.
In June, research by consumer group Which? into customers of broadband providers generally found that up to three-quarters of households are paying for advertised broadband speeds that they have never received.
Which? found that 74% are not receiving the promised headline speeds on their broadband packages - the equivalent of 15.4 million homes - despite nine in 10 people saying this was an important factor when choosing a provider.
The study also found that ''incredibly'' 98% of rural homes did not typically receive the advertised headline speed, while 31% of households in towns and cities were able to receive the maximum level.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel