For once, Greek politicians are not bearing gifts.
Six years into the country's worst post-Second World War financial crisis, Sunday's early parliamentary election is not being fought over austerity, promised debt forgiveness, public sector jobs or tax breaks.
If anything, it's about the - dim - prospect of political stability that might help restore some kind of economic normality to a country with 25% unemployment, severe banking restrictions and a crippling public debt.
Both front-runners, the radical left Syriza party and the centre-right New Democracy party, accept, with varying degrees of grace, the new tax hikes and reforms that international creditors have demanded to keep Greece afloat.
"Given that the (third bailout) has been voted by an overwhelming majority of members of the Greek parliament, there is nothing at stake in these elections," said Dimitri Sotiropoulos, assistant professor of political science at the University of Athens.
"(Syriza and New Democracy) will have very small room for manoeuvre regarding policy measures," whoever wins, he added.
The to-do list was written in July, when former prime minister Alexis Tsipras, 41, performed a remarkable U-turn under duress, dumping the anti-austerity platform that brought him to power in January. As an alternative to bankruptcy, social meltdown and an exit from Europe's monetary and political union, he agreed to a third, 86 billion euro (£62.5 billion) bailout with tight strings attached - triggering a party revolt that cost him his parliamentary majority.
In what might prove a big miscalculation, Tsipras then called an election to boost his majority. Until July, Syriza was much more popular than New Democracy, whose ratings rose under interim leader Vangelis Meimarakis, 61. The gap has shrunk massively and an outright majority is out of either party's reach.
For a country that has seen four parliamentary elections and six governments since 2009, the main issue is whether the winner will be able to last significantly longer than the previous Syriza administration's seven months. Neither is within sight of the 151 seats needed to rule alone in the 300-seat parliament.
Most likely, a three-party coalition will be required - and should be quite easily achievable with help from two small centrist, pro-European parties. A total of nine parties could enter parliament in this vote, including the Nazi-inspired, ultra-right Golden Dawn party that came third in the last election and is still polling high.
Over the next couple of months, Greece has to draft the 2016 state budget and a three-year fiscal strategy, double taxation on farmers, reform its pension system, merge all social security funds and privatise its electricity transmission system.
Also, by the end of the year, it must oversee a bank recapitalisation programme, without which depositors with over 100,000 euros (£73,000) in their accounts will be forced to chip in.
Megan Greene, chief economist at Manulife Asset Management, said there is little chance the immediate targets can be met.
"This means at some point, Greece and its creditors will end up back at the negotiating table wondering what to do about Greece being behind on its targets," she said, adding that new talk will arise of Greece possibly being forced out of the 19-nation euro currency club.
Greece has survived on international bailouts since 2010, when it lost access to bond markets after running - and keeping quiet about - a huge budget deficit.
Polls indicate many of the 9.9 million voters remain undecided or may not vote at all.
Yannis Xerakias, an unemployed shipyard worker in the depressed Athens suburb of Perama, said Tsipras "proved to be a hot potato, just like the rest of them all of these years".
"As for what I'll vote for on Sunday?" he asked. "My bed. I will enjoy it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here