Broadcaster Paul Gambaccini has told how he suffered up to six "rage attacks" a day while he was under investigation for allegations of historical sex abuse, before they were eventually dropped.
The DJ has released a memoir about the 12 months he spent on bail before the case against him was dropped by police in October last year.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "My problem was rage. I would have rage attacks, about six a day.
"In my case there could be no remorse because not only did I not know these two people but the police were accusing me of having sex in the decade before I started having same-sex relations.
"So much for 'where were you on the night of April 23?' - they were not only on the wrong day, the wrong year, they were in the wrong decade."
Criticising Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe over the long investigation, he added: "Here is a man whose organisation attempted to destroy my life and my career, and when they failed, as they had to fail, they would not admit error, they would not apologise, they would not say, 'you're innocent'."
He claims his bail was repeatedly extended until the end of high-profile cases involving other showbusiness figures because detectives working on Operation Yewtree - the police investigation into historic sex offences launched in the wake of the exposure of Jimmy Savile's crimes - did not want juries to hear that a former Radio 1 DJ had been cleared of sexual wrongdoing.
Gambaccini, who has been a fixture on UK radio for decades, has been calling for law reform including anonymity for those accused of sex abuse before they have been charged, and has backed a 28-day limit on the use of police bail.
He also believes the justice system should consider how it treats false accusers.
"They need to either be prosecuted or offered medical attention," he said.
His memoir Love, Paul Gambaccini, is out now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here