STRUGGLING sheep farmers in Norway have spoken of their surprise at calls to 'rewild' Scotland by reintroducing wild predator species such as lynx and wolves.
Norwegian Farmers' Union vice-president Kristin Ianssen said that Scotland should investigate what works in other countries before considering reintroducing wild carnivores.
The Rewilding Britain charity, whose supporters include the Forestry Commission and the John Muir Trust, wants to see new national parks being created in the Highlands which could be used to re-establish extinct species.
And Lynx UK Trust, a charity, wants to bring back the animals to selected locations in the UK, including Aberdeenshire some1,300 years after they became extinct.
Norway, which has significantly lower sheep production than Scotland, is home to around 350 lynx, 378 wolverine, 148 bears and 34 wolves living in dedicated 'wildlife' zones.
But sheep losses to predators outside these zones remains high, with 3,895 ewes and 19,671 lambs lost in 2014.
Ms Ianssen said, during a visit to Scotland, that some farmers in her home country had lost half of their herds to wild animals, and that raising sheep in areas where predators were on the prowl was no longer possible.
She said: "Norwegians are worried on behalf of Scottish farmers if carnivores are to be introduced here. We worry for the future of their sheep farming and feel sorry for them.
"We have native animals in Norway; wolves, wolverine, lynx and bears and they have lived there for centuries. Wolves had disappeared for many years because people were shooting them but the Norwegian Government decided we should have a certain amount - that was an agreement which the farmers had to adopt.
"We have a long border with Sweden to the east so we will always experience roaming carnivores in our country - it would be impossible to control. But Scotland and the UK is an island, you can decide for yourselves."
NFU Scotland met with 45 members of the Norwegian Farmers' Union on a study tour of Scotland where they highlighted the issue last week.
With around half of the land mass of Norway deemed grazing land, a key aim of the Norwegian Government is to increase food production, but Ms Ianssen said the predation problem was disturbing the breeding of sheep herds in areas which had the potential to produce a lot of food.
She said: "What we are seeing is that they cause big, big problems in areas and it is extremely hard to live with them. They have free grazing out in the forest and in the mountain and many farmers have had huge losses to all kinds of carnivores, not just lynx and wolverine but also losses to eagles and bears.
"In the worst affected areas, farmers have been forced to stop and move to areas that are less populated with the carnivores - but what happens then is the predators will also leave because they no longer have food there.
The battle against the beasts was also having a significant impact on the well-being of farmers, with many admitting to feelings of stress.
Ms Ianssen said: "One of the biggest problems they cause is the psychological stress for sheep farmers - they spend a lot of time with these animals and to be forced to stop farming is difficult. To combat it some farmers have swapped from sheep to cattle, but calves are also a target for the carnivores."
Norwegian farmers are permitted to shoot the predators and receive compensation if they lose livestock, however Ms Ianssen said the red tape involved in applying put many farmers off. The compensation scheme was, she said, only covering approximately three fifths of losses reported by farmers.
Scotland National Farmers Union vice-president Andrew McCornick has previously said: "Recent history has taught us that any species introduction can have an impact on the many benefits that the Scottish countryside currently delivers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel