CRUNCH time of sorts for the Stranraer marina story next week, when the Council considers the independent report into the £960,000 works which local councillors say is unfit for purpose for leisure boat users and disruptive to fishermen. Dumfries & Galloway Council commissioned the survey which does its job of lightly criticising the “transparency” of the process, and makes some observations about the siting of the shallow and always shingle-covered slipway but stops short of calling it unfit for purpose as the locals do. For some reason D&GC previously told Agenda that this bit of bureaucratic back-covering came free of charge but the consultant, John Fraser of Gareloch Consultants, fully intends to invoice them for a sum which, he reasonably asserts, is none of Agenda’s business. Meanwhile, local resident Barry Miller has written to the local paper with a real-life example of how the slipway actually hinders and even endangers users. Whatever the meeting concludes councillors claim that this is not the end of the story, and pressure will be put on Audit Scotland to produce an independent report into the story so far. “This is not going to go away,” says one.
THE Queensferry Crossing passed a milestone this week as the deck lifting finally got under way in perfect weather conditions on the North Tower. The process of lifting and suspending these 750 tonne slabs will proceed for a year, necessarily at a rate of about two bits a week. Delays over the foundation, and poor weather have eaten into contingency time so Transport Scotland and consortium bosses will be praying for more of the kind of weather we enjoyed last week to ensure time for the final phases once the Forth is spanned by this graceful giant.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here